» Articles » PMID: 29760849

Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Emergency Department Patients Despite Therapeutic Anticoagulation

Overview
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2018 May 16
PMID 29760849
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Emergency department (ED) patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) despite therapeutic anticoagulation at the time of diagnosis are uncommonly encountered and present a diagnostic and management challenge. Their characterization and outcomes are poorly described. We sought to describe the prevalence and characteristics of therapeutically anticoagulated patients among a population of patients with acute PE in a community setting and to describe treatment changes and 30-day outcomes.

Methods: From a large retrospective cohort of adults with acute, objectively-confirmed PE across 21 EDs between 01/2013 and 04/2015, we identified patients who arrived on direct oral or injectable anticoagulants, or warfarin with an initial ED international normalized ratio (INR) value ≥2.0. Patients were excluded from the larger cohort if they had received a diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the prior 30 days. We gathered demographic and clinical variables from electronic health records and structured manual chart review. We report discharge anticoagulation regimens and major 30-day adverse outcomes.

Results: Among 2,996 PE patients, 36 (1.2%) met study criteria. Mean age was 63 years. Eleven patients (31%) had active cancer and 25 (69%) were high risk on the PE Severity Index (Classes III-V), comparable to the larger cohort (p>0.1). Reasons for pre-arrival anticoagulation were VTE treatment or prevention (n=21), and atrial fibrillation or flutter (n=15). All patients arrived on warfarin and one was also on enoxaparin: 32 had a therapeutic INR (2.0-3.0) and four had a supratherapeutic INR (>3.0). Fifteen patients (42%) had at least one subtherapeutic INR (<2.0) in the 14 days preceding their diagnostic visit. Two patients died during hospitalization. Of the 34 ultimately discharged, 22 underwent a change in anticoagulation drug or dosing, 19 of whom received injectables, either to replace or to supplement warfarin. Four patients also received inferior vena cava filters. Thirty-day outcomes included one major hemorrhage and one additional death. No patients experienced recurrent or worsening VTE.

Conclusion: We found a low prevalence of therapeutic anticoagulation at the time of acute PE diagnosis. Most patients with breakthrough PE underwent a change in therapy, though management varied widely. Subtherapeutic anticoagulation levels in the preceding weeks were common and support the importance of anticoagulation adherence.

Citing Articles

Prevalence of and Eligibility for Surveillance Without Anticoagulation Among Adults With Lower-Risk Acute Subsegmental Pulmonary Embolism.

Rouleau S, Balasubramanian M, Huang J, Antognini T, Reed M, Vinson D JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(8):e2326898.

PMID: 37531107 PMC: 10398409. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26898.


Rare Presentation of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Submassive Pulmonary Emboli Due to Hypercoagulable State With Supratherapeutic Anticoagulation.

Rivera-Morales M, Wu J, Dub L, Ganti L Cureus. 2021; 13(8):e17300.

PMID: 34552835 PMC: 8449517. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.17300.


Presyncope Is Associated with Intensive Care Unit Admission in Emergency Department Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

Vinson D, Engelhart D, Bahl D, Othieno A, Abraham A, Huang J West J Emerg Med. 2020; 21(3):703-713.

PMID: 32421523 PMC: 7234693. DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2020.2.45028.


Massive Fatal Pulmonary Embolism While on Therapeutic Heparin Drip.

Hajouli S J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep. 2020; 8:2324709620914787.

PMID: 32208868 PMC: 7099618. DOI: 10.1177/2324709620914787.

References
1.
Escobar G, Greene J, Scheirer P, Gardner M, Draper D, Kipnis P . Risk-adjusting hospital inpatient mortality using automated inpatient, outpatient, and laboratory databases. Med Care. 2008; 46(3):232-9. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181589bb6. View

2.
Di Nisio M, van Es N, Buller H . Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Lancet. 2016; 388(10063):3060-3073. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30514-1. View

3.
Lee A, Kamphuisen P, Meyer G, Bauersachs R, Janas M, Jarner M . Tinzaparin vs Warfarin for Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Active Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015; 314(7):677-686. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.9243. View

4.
Aujesky D, Obrosky D, Stone R, Auble T, Perrier A, Cornuz J . Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005; 172(8):1041-6. PMC: 2718410. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200506-862OC. View

5.
Rodriguez-Cerrillo M, Alvarez-Arcaya A, Fernandez-Diaz E, Fernandez-Cruz A . A prospective study of the management of non-massive pulmonary embolism in the home. Eur J Intern Med. 2009; 20(6):598-600. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2009.04.003. View