» Articles » PMID: 29760090

Why We Need to Look Beyond the Glass Transition Temperature to Characterize the Dynamics of Thin Supported Polymer Films

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2018 May 16
PMID 29760090
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is significant variation in the reported magnitude and even the sign of [Formula: see text] shifts in thin polymer films with nominally the same chemistry, film thickness, and supporting substrate. The implicit assumption is that methods used to estimate [Formula: see text] in bulk materials are relevant for inferring dynamic changes in thin films. To test the validity of this assumption, we perform molecular simulations of a coarse-grained polymer melt supported on an attractive substrate. As observed in many experiments, we find that [Formula: see text] based on thermodynamic criteria (temperature dependence of film height or enthalpy) decreases with decreasing film thickness, regardless of the polymer-substrate interaction strength ε. In contrast, we find that [Formula: see text] based on a dynamic criterion (relaxation of the dynamic structure factor) also decreases with decreasing thickness when ε is relatively weak, but [Formula: see text] increases when ε exceeds the polymer-polymer interaction strength. We show that these qualitatively different trends in [Formula: see text] reflect differing sensitivities to the mobility gradient across the film. Apparently, the slowly relaxing polymer segments in the substrate region make the largest contribution to the shift of [Formula: see text] in the dynamic measurement, but this part of the film contributes less to the thermodynamic estimate of [Formula: see text] Our results emphasize the limitations of using [Formula: see text] to infer changes in the dynamics of polymer thin films. However, we show that the thermodynamic and dynamic estimates of [Formula: see text] can be combined to predict local changes in [Formula: see text] near the substrate, providing a simple method to infer information about the mobility gradient.

Citing Articles

Rapid depolymerization of poly(ethylene terephthalate) thin films by a dual-enzyme system and its impact on material properties.

Tarazona N, Wei R, Brott S, Pfaff L, Bornscheuer U, Lendlein A Chem Catal. 2023; 2(12):3573-3589.

PMID: 37350932 PMC: 10284027. DOI: 10.1016/j.checat.2022.11.004.


Growth kinetics of the adsorbed layer of poly(bisphenol A carbonate) and its effect on the glass transition behavior in thin films.

Omar H, Hidde G, Szymoniak P, Hertwig A, Schonhals A RSC Adv. 2023; 13(21):14473-14483.

PMID: 37179996 PMC: 10173819. DOI: 10.1039/d3ra02020g.


Decoupling of Glassy Dynamics from Viscosity in Thin Supported Poly(-butyl methacrylate) Films.

Chowdhury M, Monnier X, Cangialosi D, Priestley R ACS Polym Au. 2022; 2(5):333-340.

PMID: 36267547 PMC: 9576260. DOI: 10.1021/acspolymersau.2c00010.


Vitrification decoupling from α-relaxation in a metallic glass.

Monnier X, Cangialosi D, Ruta B, Busch R, Gallino I Sci Adv. 2020; 6(17):eaay1454.

PMID: 32494629 PMC: 7182406. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aay1454.


Collective Motion in the Interfacial and Interior Regions of Supported Polymer Films and Its Relation to Relaxation.

Zhang W, Starr F, Douglas J J Phys Chem B. 2019; 123(27):5935-5941.

PMID: 31192601 PMC: 7430234. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b04155.

References
1.
Ellison C, Torkelson J . The distribution of glass-transition temperatures in nanoscopically confined glass formers. Nat Mater. 2003; 2(10):695-700. DOI: 10.1038/nmat980. View

2.
Napolitano S, Glynos E, Tito N . Glass transition of polymers in bulk, confined geometries, and near interfaces. Rep Prog Phys. 2017; 80(3):036602. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6633/aa5284. View

3.
Bansal A, Yang H, Li C, Cho K, Benicewicz B, Kumar S . Quantitative equivalence between polymer nanocomposites and thin polymer films. Nat Mater. 2005; 4(9):693-8. DOI: 10.1038/nmat1447. View

4.
Mangalara J, Mackura M, Marvin M, Simmons D . The relationship between dynamic and pseudo-thermodynamic measures of the glass transition temperature in nanostructured materials. J Chem Phys. 2017; 146(20):203316. DOI: 10.1063/1.4977520. View

5.
Priestley R, Ellison C, Broadbelt L, Torkelson J . Structural relaxation of polymer glasses at surfaces, interfaces, and in between. Science. 2005; 309(5733):456-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1112217. View