» Articles » PMID: 29757823

Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test in Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To determine the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD).

Methods: This was a cross-sectional longitudinal study. Patients (n = 27, 10 males; mean age ± SD, 61 ± 9.8 y) with ILD of any etiology, who participated in an outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program, were recruited. Reliability was determined by comparing the distance covered in meters between the ISWT-1 and the ISWT-2. Validity was assessed by correlating the distance covered in the ISWT-1, with the maximum oxygen consumption ((Equation is included in full-text article.)O2max) obtained through cardiopulmonary exercise testing and distance covered during the 6-min walk test (6MWT). Responsiveness was assessed by comparing the distance covered in the ISWT-3, undertaken after the completion of PR, to the ISWT-1.

Results: The distance covered was equivalent between the ISWT-1 (216.7 ± 64.9 m) and the ISWT-2 (220.7 ± 67.3 m), with an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1 = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.81-0.95). The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change at the 95% CI (MDC95) values for the ISWT were 19.5 m and 53.9m, respectively. There were significant correlations between the distance covered on the ISWT and (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2max (r = 0.79, P < .0001) and the distance covered on the 6MWT (r = 0.76, P < .0001). Following PR, the change in the ISWT distance showed large effect size (ES = 0.85) and standardized response mean (SRM = 1.58).

Conclusions: The ISWT is a reliable, valid, and responsive measure of estimated functional capacity in patients with ILD.

Citing Articles

Clinical outcomes vary between the Shuttle Walk Test and Stress Test in patients with coronary artery disease.

Deka P, Pathak D, Miro V, Karve M, Lopez-Vilella R, Vazquez-Arce I Am Heart J Plus. 2024; 12:100064.

PMID: 38559597 PMC: 10978142. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2021.100064.


Comparison of Incremental Shuttle Walking Test, 6-Minute Walking Test, and Cardiopulmonary Exercise Stress Test in Patients with Myocardial Infarction.

Lim H, Jee S, Lee M Med Sci Monit. 2022; 28:e938140.

PMID: 36245105 PMC: 9585920. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.938140.


Comparison of physiological responses after incremental shuttle walking test and 6-minute walk test in patients with systemic sclerosis.

Ozcan Kahraman B, Tanriverdi A, Sezgin N, Acar S, Birlik A, Koken Avsar A Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2022; 136(5-6):169-176.

PMID: 36161531 DOI: 10.1007/s00508-022-02087-y.


Efficacy of simultaneous aerobic exercise and cognitive training in subjective cognitive decline: study protocol for randomized controlled trial of the Exergames Study.

Salisbury D, Plocher T, Yu F Trials. 2021; 22(1):14.

PMID: 33407727 PMC: 7788690. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04950-7.


Inter-individual differences in the responses to aerobic exercise in Alzheimer's disease: Findings from the FIT-AD trial.

Yu F, Salisbury D, Mathiason M J Sport Health Sci. 2020; 10(1):65-72.

PMID: 32505710 PMC: 7858037. DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.05.007.