» Articles » PMID: 29757357

The Revival of the Gini Importance?

Overview
Journal Bioinformatics
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 May 15
PMID 29757357
Citations 151
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Motivation: Random forests are fast, flexible and represent a robust approach to analyze high dimensional data. A key advantage over alternative machine learning algorithms are variable importance measures, which can be used to identify relevant features or perform variable selection. Measures based on the impurity reduction of splits, such as the Gini importance, are popular because they are simple and fast to compute. However, they are biased in favor of variables with many possible split points and high minor allele frequency.

Results: We set up a fast approach to debias impurity-based variable importance measures for classification, regression and survival forests. We show that it creates a variable importance measure which is unbiased with regard to the number of categories and minor allele frequency and almost as fast as the standard impurity importance. As a result, it is now possible to compute reliable importance estimates without the extra computing cost of permutations. Further, we combine the importance measure with a fast testing procedure, producing p-values for variable importance with almost no computational overhead to the creation of the random forest. Applications to gene expression and genome-wide association data show that the proposed method is powerful and computationally efficient.

Availability And Implementation: The procedure is included in the ranger package, available at https://cran.r-project.org/package=ranger and https://github.com/imbs-hl/ranger.

Supplementary Information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Citing Articles

Unveiling the antiviral inhibitory activity of ebselen and ebsulfur derivatives on SARS-CoV-2 using machine learning-based QSAR, LB-PaCS-MD, and experimental assay.

Sinsulpsiri S, Nishii Y, Xu-Xu Q, Miura M, Wilasluck P, Salamteh K Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6956.

PMID: 40011571 PMC: 11865625. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91235-1.


Predicting positive test results using large-scale longitudinal data of demographics and medication history.

Pham A, El-Kareh R, Myers F, Ohno-Machado L, Kuo T Heliyon. 2025; 11(1):e41350.

PMID: 39958729 PMC: 11825254. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41350.


Feature graphs for interpretable unsupervised tree ensembles: centrality, interaction, and application in disease subtyping.

Sirocchi C, Urschler M, Pfeifer B BioData Min. 2025; 18(1):15.

PMID: 39955586 PMC: 11829558. DOI: 10.1186/s13040-025-00430-3.


Using Structured Codes and Free-Text Notes to Measure Information Complementarity in Electronic Health Records: Feasibility and Validation Study.

Seinen T, Kors J, van Mulligen E, Rijnbeek P J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e66910.

PMID: 39946687 PMC: 11887999. DOI: 10.2196/66910.


Enhancing individual glomerular filtration rate assessment: can we trust the equation? Development and validation of machine learning models to assess the trustworthiness of estimated GFR compared to measured GFR.

Lanot A, Akesson A, Nakano F, Vens C, Bjork J, Nyman U BMC Nephrol. 2025; 26(1):47.

PMID: 39885391 PMC: 11780799. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-025-03972-0.


References
1.
Strobl C, Boulesteix A, Zeileis A, Hothorn T . Bias in random forest variable importance measures: illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007; 8:25. PMC: 1796903. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-25. View

2.
J van t Veer L, Dai H, van de Vijver M, He Y, Hart A, Mao M . Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature. 2002; 415(6871):530-6. DOI: 10.1038/415530a. View

3.
Walters R, Laurin C, Lubke G . An integrated approach to reduce the impact of minor allele frequency and linkage disequilibrium on variable importance measures for genome-wide data. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28(20):2615-23. PMC: 3467741. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts483. View

4.
Nicodemus K . Letter to the editor: on the stability and ranking of predictors from random forest variable importance measures. Brief Bioinform. 2011; 12(4):369-73. PMC: 3137934. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbr016. View

5.
Diaz-Uriarte R, de Andres S . Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006; 7:3. PMC: 1363357. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-3. View