Genes Are Up-regulated by Environmental Cues That Promote Flowering

Overview

Journal Front Plant Sci

Date 2018 May 15

PMID 29755488

Citations 21

Authors

Jared B Fudge

Robyn H Lee

Rebecca E Laurie

Kirankumar S Mysore

Jiangqi Wen

James L Weller

Richard C Macknight

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Like , the flowering of the legume is promoted by long day (LD) photoperiod and vernalization. However, there are differences in the molecular mechanisms involved, with orthologs of two key regulators, () and (), being absent or not having a role in flowering time function in . In , the MADS-box transcription factor gene, (), plays a key role in integrating the photoperiodic and vernalization pathways. In this study, we set out to investigate whether the genes play a role in regulating flowering time. Three genes were identified and characterized (). All three genes, when heterologously expressed, were able to promote earlier flowering of the late-flowering mutant. The three genes have different patterns of expression. However, consistent with a potential role in flowering time regulation, all three genes are expressed in the shoot apex and are up-regulated in the shoot apex of plants in response to LD photoperiods and vernalization. The up-regulation of genes was reduced in mutants, indicating that they are downstream of Insertion mutant alleles of do not flower late, suggestive of functional redundancy among genes in promoting flowering.

Citing Articles

Modeling Floral Induction in the Narrow-Leafed Lupin Under Different Environmental Conditions.

Duk M, Gursky V, Bankin M, Semenova E, Gurkina M, Golubkova E Plants (Basel). 2025; 13(24.

PMID: 39771246 PMC: 11678331. DOI: 10.3390/plants13243548.

A reduced vernalization requirement is a key component of the early-bolting trait in globe artichoke ( var. ).

Berentsen R, Benlloch R, Visser P, Madueno F, Balanza V iScience. 2024; 27(9):110829.

PMID: 39297164 PMC: 11409005. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110829.

CONSTANS, a HUB for all seasons: How photoperiod pervades plant physiology regulatory circuits.

Romero J, Serrano-Bueno G, Camacho-Fernandez C, Vicente M, Ruiz M, Perez-Castineira J Plant Cell. 2024; 36(6):2086-2102.

PMID: 38513610 PMC: 11132886. DOI: 10.1093/plcell/koae090.

Gene-edited triple mutant Medicago plants do not flower.

Poulet A, Zhao M, Peng Y, Tham F, Jaudal M, Zhang L Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1357924.

PMID: 38469328 PMC: 10926907. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1357924.

Light controls mesophyll-specific post-transcriptional splicing of photoregulatory genes by AtPRMT5.

Yan Y, Luo H, Qin Y, Yan T, Jia J, Hou Y Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(6):e2317408121.

PMID: 38285953 PMC: 10861865. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2317408121.

References

Helliwell C, Wood C, Robertson M, Peacock W, Dennis E . The Arabidopsis FLC protein interacts directly in vivo with SOC1 and FT chromatin and is part of a high-molecular-weight protein complex. Plant J. 2006; 46(2):183-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02686.x. View

Lee H, Suh S, Park E, Cho E, Ahn J, Kim S . The AGAMOUS-LIKE 20 MADS domain protein integrates floral inductive pathways in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2000; 14(18):2366-76. PMC: 316936. DOI: 10.1101/gad.813600. View

Laurie R, Diwadkar P, Jaudal M, Zhang L, Hecht V, Wen J . The Medicago FLOWERING LOCUS T homolog, MtFTa1, is a key regulator of flowering time. Plant Physiol. 2011; 156(4):2207-24. PMC: 3149922. DOI: 10.1104/pp.111.180182. View

Notaguchi M, Abe M, Kimura T, Daimon Y, Kobayashi T, Yamaguchi A . Long-distance, graft-transmissible action of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T protein to promote flowering. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008; 49(11):1645-58. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcn154. View

Wong A, Hecht V, Picard K, Diwadkar P, Laurie R, Wen J . Isolation and functional analysis of CONSTANS-LIKE genes suggests that a central role for CONSTANS in flowering time control is not evolutionarily conserved in Medicago truncatula. Front Plant Sci. 2014; 5:486. PMC: 4166892. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00486. View

Ietswaart R, Wu Z, Dean C . Flowering time control: another window to the connection between antisense RNA and chromatin. Trends Genet. 2012; 28(9):445-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2012.06.002. View

Wigge P, Kim M, Jaeger K, Busch W, Schmid M, Lohmann J . Integration of spatial and temporal information during floral induction in Arabidopsis. Science. 2005; 309(5737):1056-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1114358. View

Jaudal M, Yeoh C, Zhang L, Stockum C, Mysore K, Ratet P . Retroelement insertions at the Medicago FTa1 locus in spring mutants eliminate vernalisation but not long-day requirements for early flowering. Plant J. 2013; 76(4):580-91. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.12315. View

Pfaffl M . A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29(9):e45. PMC: 55695. DOI: 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45. View

10.

Jung J, Ju Y, Seo P, Lee J, Park C . The SOC1-SPL module integrates photoperiod and gibberellic acid signals to control flowering time in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2011; 69(4):577-88. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04813.x. View

11.

Kim H, Abbasi N, Choi S . Bruno-like proteins modulate flowering time via 3' UTR-dependent decay of SOC1 mRNA. New Phytol. 2013; 198(3):747-756. DOI: 10.1111/nph.12181. View

12.

Onouchi H, Igeno M, Perilleux C, Graves K, Coupland G . Mutagenesis of plants overexpressing CONSTANS demonstrates novel interactions among Arabidopsis flowering-time genes. Plant Cell. 2000; 12(6):885-900. PMC: 149091. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.12.6.885. View

13.

Tadege M, Wen J, He J, Tu H, Kwak Y, Eschstruth A . Large-scale insertional mutagenesis using the Tnt1 retrotransposon in the model legume Medicago truncatula. Plant J. 2008; 54(2):335-47. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03418.x. View

14.

Lee J, Yoo S, Park S, Hwang I, Lee J, Ahn J . Role of SVP in the control of flowering time by ambient temperature in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2007; 21(4):397-402. PMC: 1804328. DOI: 10.1101/gad.1518407. View

15.

Whittaker C, Dean C . The FLC Locus: A Platform for Discoveries in Epigenetics and Adaptation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2017; 33:555-575. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100616-060546. View

16.

Mateos J, Madrigal P, Tsuda K, Rawat V, Richter R, Romera-Branchat M . Combinatorial activities of SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE and FLOWERING LOCUS C define distinct modes of flowering regulation in Arabidopsis. Genome Biol. 2015; 16:31. PMC: 4378019. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-015-0597-1. View

17.

Kardailsky I, Shukla V, Ahn J, Dagenais N, Christensen S, Nguyen J . Activation tagging of the floral inducer FT. Science. 1999; 286(5446):1962-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.286.5446.1962. View

18.

Young N, Bharti A . Genome-enabled insights into legume biology. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2012; 63:283-305. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103754. View

19.

Severin A, Woody J, Bolon Y, Joseph B, Diers B, Farmer A . RNA-Seq Atlas of Glycine max: a guide to the soybean transcriptome. BMC Plant Biol. 2010; 10:160. PMC: 3017786. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-160. View

20.

Andres F, Coupland G . The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues. Nat Rev Genet. 2012; 13(9):627-39. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3291. View