» Articles » PMID: 29755237

The Expandable Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion - Two Years Follow-up

Overview
Date 2018 May 15
PMID 29755237
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: This was a retrospective, observational study.

Objectives: We hypothesize that the expandable transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cage achieves satisfactory clinical outcomes while allowing for safe placement, improvement, and maintenance of foraminal and disc dimensions at 24 months postsurgery with low risk of cage migration, subsidence, and nerve injury.

Methods: TLIF with expandable cages was performed in 54 patients (62 levels) over a 24-month-period using open midline or minimally invasive surgery techniques with placement of Globus Caliber, Rise, or Altera expandable cages. All patients underwent clinical and radiological assessment at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1, and 2 years postoperatively. Clinical outcome was measured by Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analog pain score for both back and leg (visual analog scores [VASs]). Radiological assessment was done by X-ray standing lateral position.

Results: There were significant clinical improvements in ODI, VAS leg, and VAS back at all postoperative time points. Disc height, foraminal height, focal Cobb angle, and global Cobb angle were significantly increased and maintained at all time points for 24 months ( < 0.001). Dural tear occurred in one patient (1.9%). There were neither intra- or postoperative neurological complications nor cage subsidence nor migration.

Conclusions: These preliminary results indicate that the use of an expandable interbody cage achieves good clinical outcomes by improving and maintaining foraminal dimensions and disc height with minimal complication rate.

Citing Articles

Advancements in Custom 3D-Printed Titanium Interbody Spinal Fusion Cages and Their Relevance in Personalized Spine Care.

Lewandrowski K, Vira S, Elfar J, Lorio M J Pers Med. 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 39202002 PMC: 11355268. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14080809.


Exploring the differences in radiologic and clinical outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with single- and bi-planar expandable cages: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Matsoukas S, Karabacak M, Margetis K Neurosurg Rev. 2024; 47(1):36.

PMID: 38191751 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-02277-w.


Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with an expandable interbody device: Two-year clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Weinstein M, Ayala G, Roura R, Christmas K, Warren D, Simon P N Am Spine Soc J. 2023; 16:100286.

PMID: 38025939 PMC: 10652136. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100286.


Expandable versus static cages in unilateral biportal endoscopy lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) for treating degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS): comparison of clinical and radiological results.

Cao S, Fan B, Song X, Wang Y, Yin W J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):505.

PMID: 37461049 PMC: 10353249. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03979-z.


Early Experience With Uniplanar Versus Biplanar Expandable Interbody Fusion Devices in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Ledesma J, Ottaway J, Lambrechts M, Dees A, Thomas T, Kurd M Neurospine. 2023; 20(2):487-497.

PMID: 37401067 PMC: 10323343. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2244870.435.


References
1.
Zhang K, Sun W, Zhao C, Li H, Ding W, Xie Y . Unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disorders: a prospective randomised study. Int Orthop. 2013; 38(1):111-6. PMC: 3890130. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2026-y. View

2.
Rouben D, Casnellie M, Ferguson M . Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010; 24(5):288-96. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181f9a60a. View

3.
Foley K, Lefkowitz M . Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. Clin Neurosurg. 2003; 49:499-517. View

4.
Brantigan J, Steffee A . A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993; 18(14):2106-7. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199310001-00030. View

5.
Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Li C, Zheng W, Liu J . Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Eur Spine J. 2010; 19(10):1780-4. PMC: 2989221. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1404-z. View