Study Design:
This was a retrospective, observational study.
Objectives:
We hypothesize that the expandable transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cage achieves satisfactory clinical outcomes while allowing for safe placement, improvement, and maintenance of foraminal and disc dimensions at 24 months postsurgery with low risk of cage migration, subsidence, and nerve injury.
Methods:
TLIF with expandable cages was performed in 54 patients (62 levels) over a 24-month-period using open midline or minimally invasive surgery techniques with placement of Globus Caliber, Rise, or Altera expandable cages. All patients underwent clinical and radiological assessment at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1, and 2 years postoperatively. Clinical outcome was measured by Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analog pain score for both back and leg (visual analog scores [VASs]). Radiological assessment was done by X-ray standing lateral position.
Results:
There were significant clinical improvements in ODI, VAS leg, and VAS back at all postoperative time points. Disc height, foraminal height, focal Cobb angle, and global Cobb angle were significantly increased and maintained at all time points for 24 months ( < 0.001). Dural tear occurred in one patient (1.9%). There were neither intra- or postoperative neurological complications nor cage subsidence nor migration.
Conclusions:
These preliminary results indicate that the use of an expandable interbody cage achieves good clinical outcomes by improving and maintaining foraminal dimensions and disc height with minimal complication rate.
Citing Articles
Advancements in Custom 3D-Printed Titanium Interbody Spinal Fusion Cages and Their Relevance in Personalized Spine Care.
Lewandrowski K, Vira S, Elfar J, Lorio M
J Pers Med. 2024; 14(8).
PMID: 39202002
PMC: 11355268.
DOI: 10.3390/jpm14080809.
Exploring the differences in radiologic and clinical outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with single- and bi-planar expandable cages: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Matsoukas S, Karabacak M, Margetis K
Neurosurg Rev. 2024; 47(1):36.
PMID: 38191751
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-02277-w.
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with an expandable interbody device: Two-year clinical and radiographic outcomes.
Weinstein M, Ayala G, Roura R, Christmas K, Warren D, Simon P
N Am Spine Soc J. 2023; 16:100286.
PMID: 38025939
PMC: 10652136.
DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100286.
Expandable versus static cages in unilateral biportal endoscopy lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) for treating degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS): comparison of clinical and radiological results.
Cao S, Fan B, Song X, Wang Y, Yin W
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):505.
PMID: 37461049
PMC: 10353249.
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03979-z.
Early Experience With Uniplanar Versus Biplanar Expandable Interbody Fusion Devices in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Ledesma J, Ottaway J, Lambrechts M, Dees A, Thomas T, Kurd M
Neurospine. 2023; 20(2):487-497.
PMID: 37401067
PMC: 10323343.
DOI: 10.14245/ns.2244870.435.
Biplanar Expandable Cages for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Are Safe and Achieve Good 1-Year Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in an Asian Population.
Sim D, Kasivishvanaath A, Jiang L, Soh R, Ling Z
Int J Spine Surg. 2023; 17(4):520-525.
PMID: 37076255
PMC: 10478701.
DOI: 10.14444/8472.
Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable vs Static Titanium Interbody Cages: A Prospective Cohort Study of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.
Huo C, Malham G, Biddau D, Chung T, Wang Y
Int J Spine Surg. 2023; 17(2):265-275.
PMID: 36889901
PMC: 10165658.
DOI: 10.14444/8422.
Static versus Expandable Interbody Fusion Devices: A Comparison of 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Ledesma J, Lambrechts M, Dees A, Thomas T, Hiranaka C, Kurd M
Asian Spine J. 2022; 17(1):61-74.
PMID: 35785911
PMC: 9977975.
DOI: 10.31616/asj.2021.0486.
Laterally Placed Expandable Interbody Spacers With and Without Adjustable Lordosis Improve Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study.
Li Y, Huang Z, Towner J, Li Y, Bucklen B
Cureus. 2022; 13(12):e20302.
PMID: 35028207
PMC: 8748004.
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.20302.
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable articulating interbody spacers significantly improves radiographic outcomes compared to static interbody spacers.
Russo A, Schopler S, Stetzner K, Shirk T
J Spine Surg. 2021; 7(3):300-309.
PMID: 34734134
PMC: 8511571.
DOI: 10.21037/jss-20-630.
Bidirectional Expandable Technology for Transforaminal or Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Analysis of Safety and Performance.
Coric D, Roybal R, Grubb M, Rossi V, Yu A, Swink I
Int J Spine Surg. 2020; 14(s3):S22-S30.
PMID: 33122186
PMC: 7735440.
DOI: 10.14444/7123.
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Early Experience Using a Biplanar Expandable Cage for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
Tan L, Rivera J, Tan X, Le V, Khoo L, Berven S
Int J Spine Surg. 2020; 14(s3):S39-S44.
PMID: 33122185
PMC: 7735467.
DOI: 10.14444/7125.
Expandable Interbody Fusion Cages: An Editorial on the Surgeon's Perspective on Recent Technological Advances and Their Biomechanical Implications.
Lewandrowski K, Ferrara L, Cheng B
Int J Spine Surg. 2020; 14(s3):S56-S62.
PMID: 33122184
PMC: 7735473.
DOI: 10.14444/7127.
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable cages: Radiological and clinical results of banana-shaped and straight implants.
Tassemeier T, Haversath M, Jager M
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2018; 9(3):196-201.
PMID: 30443140
PMC: 6187892.
DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_56_18.