» Articles » PMID: 29751743

Dissecting Closely Linked Association Signals in Combination with the Mammalian Phenotype Database Can Identify Candidate Genes in Dairy Cattle

Overview
Journal BMC Genet
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2018 May 13
PMID 29751743
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been successfully implemented in cattle research and breeding. However, moving from the associations to identifying the causal variants and revealing underlying mechanisms have proven complicated. In dairy cattle populations, we face a challenge due to long-range linkage disequilibrium (LD) arising from close familial relationships in the studied individuals. Long range LD makes it difficult to distinguish if one or multiple quantitative trait loci (QTL) are segregating in a genomic region showing association with a phenotype. We had two objectives in this study: 1) to distinguish between multiple QTL segregating in a genomic region, and 2) use of external information to prioritize candidate genes for a QTL along with the candidate variant.

Results: We observed fixing the lead SNP as a covariate can help to distinguish additional close association signal(s). Thereafter, using the mammalian phenotype database, we successfully found candidate genes, in concordance with previous studies, demonstrating the power of this strategy. Secondly, we used variant annotation information to search for causative variants in our candidate genes. The variant information successfully identified known causal mutations and showed the potential to pinpoint the causative mutation(s) which are located in coding regions.

Conclusions: Our approach can distinguish multiple QTL segregating on the same chromosome in a single analysis without manual input. Moreover, utilizing information from the mammalian phenotype database and variant effect predictor as post-GWAS analysis could benefit in candidate genes and causative mutations finding in cattle. Our study not only identified additional candidate genes for milk traits, but also can serve as a routine method for GWAS in dairy cattle.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive selection signature analyses in dairy cattle exploiting purebred and crossbred genomic data.

Nayak S, Panigrahi M, Rajawat D, Ghildiyal K, Sharma A, Parida S Mamm Genome. 2023; 34(4):615-631.

PMID: 37843569 DOI: 10.1007/s00335-023-10021-4.


Genomewide Association Analyses of Lactation Persistency and Milk Production Traits in Holstein Cattle Based on Imputed Whole-Genome Sequence Data.

Pedrosa V, Schenkel F, Chen S, Oliveira H, Casey T, Melka M Genes (Basel). 2021; 12(11).

PMID: 34828436 PMC: 8624223. DOI: 10.3390/genes12111830.


Genomic measures of inbreeding coefficients and genome-wide scan for runs of homozygosity islands in Iranian river buffalo, Bubalus bubalis.

Ghoreishifar S, Moradi-Shahrbabak H, Fallahi M, Jalil Sarghale A, Moradi-Shahrbabak M, Abdollahi-Arpanahi R BMC Genet. 2020; 21(1):16.

PMID: 32041535 PMC: 7011551. DOI: 10.1186/s12863-020-0824-y.


Multi-population GWAS and enrichment analyses reveal novel genomic regions and promising candidate genes underlying bovine milk fatty acid composition.

Gebreyesus G, Buitenhuis A, Poulsen N, Visker M, Zhang Q, van Valenberg H BMC Genomics. 2019; 20(1):178.

PMID: 30841852 PMC: 6404302. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-5573-9.


Retraction Note: Dissecting closely linked association signals in combination with the mammalian phenotype database can identify candidate genes in dairy cattle.

Cai Z, Guldbrandtsen B, Lund M, Sahana G BMC Genet. 2018; 19(1):111.

PMID: 30537928 PMC: 6288910. DOI: 10.1186/s12863-018-0698-4.


References
1.
Olsen H, Nilsen H, Hayes B, Berg P, Svendsen M, Lien S . Genetic support for a quantitative trait nucleotide in the ABCG2 gene affecting milk composition of dairy cattle. BMC Genet. 2007; 8:32. PMC: 1924865. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-8-32. View

2.
Cao Y, Bonizzi G, Seagroves T, Greten F, Johnson R, SCHMIDT E . IKKalpha provides an essential link between RANK signaling and cyclin D1 expression during mammary gland development. Cell. 2001; 107(6):763-75. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00599-2. View

3.
Lipkin E, Straus K, Stein R, Bagnato A, Schiavini F, Fontanesi L . Extensive long-range and nonsyntenic linkage disequilibrium in livestock populations: deconstruction of a conundrum. Genetics. 2008; 181(2):691-9. PMC: 2644957. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.097402. View

4.
Howie B, Marchini J, Stephens M . Genotype imputation with thousands of genomes. G3 (Bethesda). 2012; 1(6):457-70. PMC: 3276165. DOI: 10.1534/g3.111.001198. View

5.
Sveinbjornsson G, Albrechtsen A, Zink F, Gudjonsson S, Oddson A, Masson G . Weighting sequence variants based on their annotation increases power of whole-genome association studies. Nat Genet. 2016; 48(3):314-7. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3507. View