» Articles » PMID: 29750058

Australian Cardiac Rehabilitation Exercise Parameter Characteristics and Perceptions of High-intensity Interval Training: a Cross-sectional Survey

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2018 May 12
PMID 29750058
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study explored current demographics, characteristics, costs, evaluation methods, and outcome measures used in Australian cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs. It also determined the actual usage and perceptions of high-intensity interval training (HIIT).

Methods: A cross-sectional observational web-based survey was distributed to 328 Australian CR programs nationally.

Results: A total of 261 programs completed the survey (79.6% response rate). Most Australian CR programs were located in a hospital setting (76%), offered exercise sessions once a week (52%) for 6-8 weeks (49%) at moderate intensity (54%) for 46-60 min (62%), and serviced 101-500 clients per annum (38%). HIIT was reported in only 1% of programs, and 27% of respondents believed that it was safe while 42% of respondents were unsure. Lack of staff (25%), monitoring resources (20%), and staff knowledge (18%) were the most commonly reported barriers to the implementation of HIIT. Overall, Australian CR coordinators are unsure of the cost of exercise sessions.

Conclusion: There is variability in CR delivery across Australia. Only half of programs reassess outcome measures postintervention, and cost of exercise sessions is unknown. Although HIIT is recommended in international CR guidelines, it is essentially not being used in Australia and clinicians are unsure as to the safety of HIIT. Lack of resources and staff knowledge were perceived as the biggest barriers to HIIT implementation, and there are inconsistent perceptions of prescreening and monitoring requirements. This study highlights the need to educate health professionals about the benefits and safety of HIIT to improve its usage and patient outcomes.

Citing Articles

National survey of Australian cardiac rehabilitation programmes: does current exercise programming adhere to evidence-based guidelines and best practice?.

Hollings M, Mavros Y, Freeston J, Fiatarone Singh M BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2023; 9(1):e001468.

PMID: 36865770 PMC: 9972448. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001468.


Optimizing Outcomes in Cardiac Rehabilitation: The Importance of Exercise Intensity.

Taylor J, Bonikowske A, Olson T Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8:734278.

PMID: 34540924 PMC: 8446279. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.734278.


Impact of wearable physical activity monitoring devices with exercise prescription or advice in the maintenance phase of cardiac rehabilitation: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hannan A, Harders M, Hing W, Climstein M, Coombes J, Furness J BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2019; 11:14.

PMID: 31384474 PMC: 6668165. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-019-0126-8.

References
1.
McCartney N, McKelvie R, HASLAM D, Jones N . Usefulness of weightlifting training in improving strength and maximal power output in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1991; 67(11):939-45. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90164-g. View

2.
Swain D, Franklin B . Comparison of cardioprotective benefits of vigorous versus moderate intensity aerobic exercise. Am J Cardiol. 2005; 97(1):141-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.07.130. View

3.
Grace S, Bennett S, Ardern C, Clark A . Cardiac rehabilitation series: Canada. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014; 56(5):530-5. PMC: 4559456. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2013.09.010. View

4.
Liou K, Ho S, Fildes J, Ooi S . High Intensity Interval versus Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-analysis of Physiological and Clinical Parameters. Heart Lung Circ. 2015; 25(2):166-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2015.06.828. View

5.
Hannan A, Hing W, Simas V, Climstein M, Coombes J, Jayasinghe R . High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training within cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Access J Sports Med. 2018; 9:1-17. PMC: 5790162. DOI: 10.2147/OAJSM.S150596. View