» Articles » PMID: 29749840

Contemporary Issues in Group Learning in Undergraduate Science Classrooms: A Perspective from Student Engagement

Overview
Date 2018 May 12
PMID 29749840
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As the use of collaborative-learning methods such as group work in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics classes has grown, so has the research into factors impacting effectiveness, the kinds of learning engendered, and demographic differences in student response. Generalizing across the range of this research is complicated by the diversity of group-learning approaches used. In this overview, I discuss theories of how group-work formats support or hinder learning based on the ICAP (interactive, constructive, active, passive) framework of student engagement. I then use this model to analyze current issues in group learning, such as the nature of student discourse during group work, the role of group learning in making our classrooms inclusive, and how classroom spaces factor into group learning. I identify key gaps for further research and propose implications from this research for teaching practice. This analysis helps identify essential, effective, and efficient features of group learning, thus providing faculty with constructive guidelines to support their work and affirm their efforts.

Citing Articles

Thinking and Learning in Nested Systems: The Classroom Level.

Talanquer V, Cole R, Rushton G J Chem Educ. 2024; 101(2):295-306.

PMID: 38370573 PMC: 10868584. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00839.


Structured Worksheets: Simple Active Learning Strategies to Increase Transparency and Promote Communication.

Buffalari D J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2024; 20(2):A241-A253.

PMID: 38323058 PMC: 10653243. DOI: 10.59390/VOHJ7109.


Comparing the Efficacy of Individual Approaches and Team-Based Approaches in Solving Clinical Case Vignettes.

Singh A, Kumari A, Kumari A, Juhi A, Dhanvijay A, Pinjar M Cureus. 2023; 15(10):e47796.

PMID: 38021764 PMC: 10676623. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47796.


Forming Groups in a Large-Enrollment Biology Class: Group Permanence Matters More than Group Size.

Connell G, Donovan D, Theobald E CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023; 22(4):ar37.

PMID: 37751500 PMC: 10756034. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.22-08-0172.


Online medical history taking course: Opportunities and limitations in comparison to traditional bedside teaching.

Lange S, Kruger N, Warm M, Op den Winkel M, Buechel J, Huber J GMS J Med Educ. 2022; 39(3):Doc34.

PMID: 36119150 PMC: 9469571. DOI: 10.3205/zma001555.


References
1.
Soneral P, Wyse S . A SCALE-UP Mock-Up: Comparison of Student Learning Gains in High- and Low-Tech Active-Learning Environments. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017; 16(1). PMC: 5332038. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.16-07-0228. View

2.
Smith M, Wood W, Adams W, Wieman C, Knight J, Guild N . Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science. 2009; 323(5910):122-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1165919. View

3.
Linton D, Farmer J, Peterson E . Is Peer Interaction Necessary for Optimal Active Learning?. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015; 13(2):243-52. PMC: 4041502. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.13-10-0201. View

4.
Eddy S, Brownell S, Wenderoth M . Gender gaps in achievement and participation in multiple introductory biology classrooms. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2014; 13(3):478-92. PMC: 4152209. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.13-10-0204. View

5.
Eddy S, Hogan K . Getting under the hood: how and for whom does increasing course structure work?. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2014; 13(3):453-68. PMC: 4152207. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050. View