» Articles » PMID: 29748159

Multistakeholder Perspectives on Maternal Text Messaging Intervention in Uganda: Qualitative Study

Overview
Date 2018 May 12
PMID 29748159
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Despite continued interest in the use of mobile health for improving maternal health outcomes, there have been limited attempts to identify relevant program theories.

Objectives: This study had two aims: first, to explicate the assumptions of program designers, which we call the program theory and second, to contrast this program theory with empirical data to gain a better understanding of mechanisms, facilitators, and barriers related to the program outcomes.

Methods: To achieve the aforementioned objectives, we conducted a retrospective qualitative study of a text messaging (short message service) platform geared at improving individual maternal health outcomes in Uganda. Through interviews with program designers (n=3), we elicited 3 main designers' assumptions and explored these against data from qualitative interviews with primary beneficiaries (n=26; 15 women and 11 men) and health service providers (n=6), as well as 6 focus group discussions with village health team members (n=50) who were all involved in the program.

Results: Our study results highlighted that while the program designers' assumptions were appropriate, additional mechanisms and contextual factors, such as the importance of incentives for village health team members, mobile phone ownership, and health system factors should have been considered.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that text messages could be an effective part of a more comprehensive maternal health program when context and system barriers are identified and addressed in the program theories.

Citing Articles

Contextual success and pitfalls of mHealth service for maternal and child health in Africa: An Intervention, Context, Actors, Mechanism, and Outcome (ICAMO) framework guided systematic review of qualitative evidence.

Gilano G, Zeleke E, Dekker A, Fijten R BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):690.

PMID: 39438852 PMC: 11515713. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06885-2.


Barriers and benefits of mHealth for community health workers in integrated community case management of childhood diseases in Banda Parish, Kampala, Uganda: a cross-sectional study.

Kansiime W, Atusingwize E, Ndejjo R, Balinda E, Ntanda M, Mugambe R BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):173.

PMID: 38769485 PMC: 11103880. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02430-4.


Cancer as a death sentence: developing an initial program theory for an IVR intervention.

Ilozumba O, Kabukye J, de Keizer N, Cornet R, Broerse J Health Promot Int. 2022; 37(3).

PMID: 35913900 PMC: 9342624. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daac070.


The Role of mHealth Interventions in Changing Gender Relations: Systematic Review of Qualitative Findings.

Kirkwood E, Clymer C, Imbulana K, Mozumder S, Dibley M, Alam N JMIR Hum Factors. 2022; 9(3):e32330.

PMID: 35862143 PMC: 9353673. DOI: 10.2196/32330.


Do Women in Nepal Like Playing a Mobile Game? MANTRA: A Mobile Gamified App for Improving Healthcare Seeking Behavior in Rural Nepal.

Kayastha R, Mueller S, Yadav P, Kelman I, Boscor A, Saville N Front Public Health. 2021; 9:645837.

PMID: 34805057 PMC: 8603420. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.645837.


References
1.
Chib A, Van Velthoven M, Car J . mHealth adoption in low-resource environments: a review of the use of mobile healthcare in developing countries. J Health Commun. 2014; 20(1):4-34. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2013.864735. View

2.
Musinguzi L, Turinawe E, Rwemisisi J, de Vries D, Mafigiri D, Muhangi D . Linking communities to formal health care providers through village health teams in rural Uganda: lessons from linking social capital. Hum Resour Health. 2017; 15(1):4. PMC: 5225547. DOI: 10.1186/s12960-016-0177-9. View

3.
Amoakoh-Coleman M, Borgstein A, Sondaal S, Grobbee D, Miltenburg A, Verwijs M . Effectiveness of mHealth Interventions Targeting Health Care Workers to Improve Pregnancy Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2016; 18(8):e226. PMC: 5010646. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5533. View

4.
Watterson J, Walsh J, Madeka I . Using mHealth to Improve Usage of Antenatal Care, Postnatal Care, and Immunization: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015:153402. PMC: 4561933. DOI: 10.1155/2015/153402. View

5.
Singh D, Negin J, Otim M, Orach C, Cumming R . The effect of payment and incentives on motivation and focus of community health workers: five case studies from low- and middle-income countries. Hum Resour Health. 2015; 13:58. PMC: 4501095. DOI: 10.1186/s12960-015-0051-1. View