» Articles » PMID: 29747139

Prevalence of Anxiety in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal J Affect Disord
Date 2018 May 11
PMID 29747139
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Prevalence rates of anxiety in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) varied widely across studies and may confer a higher likelihood of progression to dementia. Our aim was to estimate the prevalence of anxiety in MCI and identify reasons for heterogeneity in the reported results.

Methods: A computerized search in PubMed, EMBASE, and Psyc INFO for studies on anxiety in MCI was performed up to March 2017. The overall prevalence of anxiety in patients with MCI was pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was explored using stratification (recruitment resource; method of anxiety diagnosis; method of MCI diagnosis; and region) and random-effects meta-regression.

Results: Of 2494 unique abstracts, 290 were selected for full-text review, and 39 studies, representing 10,587 patients, met all inclusion criteria. The overall pooled prevalence of depression in patients with MCI was 21.0% (95% CI, 16.2-26.7) with significant heterogeneity present (I = 97.2%, p < 0.001). When stratified by source, the prevalence of anxiety in patients with MCI in community-based samples was 14.3% (95% CI, 9.7-20.5) and was 31.2% (95% CI, 23.6-40.0) in clinic-based samples, which was significantly different (p < 0.01). The prevalence of anxiety estimates also differed significantly, when stratification by the method of anxiety diagnosis (p < 0.01). However, the criteria used for MCI diagnosis and geographical region did not significantly influence the prevalence estimate.

Limitations: We did not consider the usage of anti-anxiety drugs and language bias.

Conclusions: The prevalence of anxiety in patients with MCI was common and variability in prevalence of anxiety across studies can be attributed partly to the source of the sample and method of anxiety diagnosis. Further research is needed to identify sources of heterogeneity.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of digital health interventions in improving mental health of older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Huang A, Liu X, Gu A, Zhao D, Huang C, Wang L Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241288651.

PMID: 39403715 PMC: 11472367. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241288651.


The role of cognitive flexibility on higher level executive functions in mild cognitive impairment and healthy older adults.

Corbo I, Troisi G, Marselli G, Casagrande M BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):317.

PMID: 38816884 PMC: 11140914. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01807-5.


Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Comparative Study with Healthy Older Adults.

Sair Y, Sair A Psychiatry Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024; 32(3):222-228.

PMID: 38766675 PMC: 11099617. DOI: 10.5152/pcp.2022.21129.


Visually assessing work performance using a smartwatch via day-to-day fluctuations in heart rate variability.

Okawara H, Shiraishi Y, Sato K, Nakamura M, Katsumata Y Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241239240.

PMID: 38533307 PMC: 10964452. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241239240.


Effectiveness, acceptability, and completeness and quality of intervention reporting of psychological interventions for people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review.

Svedin F, Blomberg O, Farrand P, Brantnell A, von Essen L, Aberg A BMJ Open. 2023; 13(12):e077180.

PMID: 38086581 PMC: 10729069. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077180.