» Articles » PMID: 29743599

Crural Closure Improves Outcomes of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation in GERD Patients with Hiatal Hernia

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2018 May 11
PMID 29743599
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Magnetic sphincter-augmentation (MSA) has been proven effective in the treatment of GERD. No consensus exists on whether crural closure should be performed. Our aim was to assess the impact of cruroplasty on reflux-control and quality of life. MSA-Patients treated between 03/2012-03/2017 were classified into those without hiatal hernia ("NHH"), those post-MSA (NHR) and those post-MSA/hiatal repair (HR). GERD-symptoms, PPI-intake, GERD-Health-related-Quality-of-Life (GERD-HRQL) and Alimentary Satisfaction were assessed. Sixty-eight patients underwent MSA, 26 patients had additional crural closure. PH-monitoring was negative in 80% of HR, 73% of NHR and 89% of NHH-patients. GERD-HRQL-total scores decreased significantly in all groups (p < 0.001). Alimentary satisfaction was 8/10 in HR/NHH and 10/10 in NHR-patients. Satisfaction with heartburn relief was high (HR: 96%, NR: 95%, NHH: 94%) as was the elimination of PPI-intake (HR/NHH: 87%, NR: 86%). Heartburn and regurgitations were eliminated in 100% of HR, 88% and 94% of NHR and 87% and 91% of NHH-patients. Endoscopic dilatation or device explantation was performed in 3% each. MSA leads to significant symptom relief, increased quality of life and alimentary satisfaction with low perioperative morbidity. Cruroplasty tends to result in better reflux control and symptom relief than exclusive MSA without increasing dysphagia rates.

Citing Articles

Longer-term outcomes of gastroesophageal reflux disease treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation.

Puri A, Steven S, Markar S, Boyle N Dis Esophagus. 2023; 36(10).

PMID: 36942526 PMC: 10789235. DOI: 10.1093/dote/doad014.


Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Outcomes in Severe Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Ferrari D, Siboni S, Riva C, Guerrazzi G, Lovece A, Bonavina L Front Med (Lausanne). 2021; 8:645592.

PMID: 34796181 PMC: 8592890. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.645592.


Laparoscopic posterior cruroplasty: a patient tailored approach.

Aiolfi A, Cavalli M, Saino G, Sozzi A, Bonitta G, Micheletto G Hernia. 2020; 26(2):619-626.

PMID: 32335756 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02188-5.


Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation After Gastric Surgery.

Riva C, Asti E, Lazzari V, Aquilino K, Siboni S, Bonavina L JSLS. 2019; 23(4).

PMID: 31624454 PMC: 6785249. DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2019.00035.


Does Treatment of the Hiatus Influence the Outcomes of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Chronic GERD?.

Irribarra M, Blitz S, Wilshire C, Jackson A, Farivar A, Aye R J Gastrointest Surg. 2019; 23(6):1104-1112.

PMID: 30877608 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04180-6.


References
1.
Louie B, Farivar A, Shultz D, Brennan C, Vallieres E, Aye R . Short-term outcomes using magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for medically resistant gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 98(2):498-504. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.04.074. View

2.
Bonavina L, Saino G, Lipham J, DeMeester T . LINX(®) Reflux Management System in chronic gastroesophageal reflux: a novel effective technology for restoring the natural barrier to reflux. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2013; 6(4):261-8. PMC: 3667475. DOI: 10.1177/1756283X13486311. View

3.
DeMeester T . Surgical Options for the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2017; 13(2):128-129. PMC: 5402685. View

4.
Skubleny D, Switzer N, Dang J, Gill R, Shi X, de Gara C . LINX magnetic esophageal sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2016; 31(8):3078-3084. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5370-3. View

5.
Warren H, Reynolds J, Lipham J, Zehetner J, Bildzukewicz N, Taiganides P . Multi-institutional outcomes using magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc. 2015; 30(8):3289-96. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4659-y. View