» Articles » PMID: 29743321

Identical Anthropometric Characteristics of Impaired Fasting Glucose Combined with Impaired Glucose Tolerance and Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: Anthropometric Indicators to Predict Hyperglycaemia in a Community-based Prospective Cohort Study In...

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2018 May 11
PMID 29743321
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To assess the anthropometric characteristics of normoglycaemic individuals who subsequently developed hyperglycaemia, and to evaluate the validity of these measures to predict prediabetes and diabetes.

Design: A community-based prospective cohort study.

Participants: In total, 1885 residents with euglycaemia at baseline from six communities were enrolled.

Setting: Sichuan, southwest China.

Primary Outcome Measures: The incidences of prediabetes and diabetes were the primary outcomes.

Methods: The waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) of all participants were measured at baseline and during follow-up. A 75 g glucose oral glucose tolerance test was conducted at each survey.

Results: During a median of 3.00 (IQR: 2.92-4.17) years follow-up, the cumulative incidence of isolated impaired fasting glucose (IFG), isolated impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), IFG combined with IGT (IFG+IGT), and newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (NDDM) were 8.44%, 18.14%, 8.06% and 13.79%, respectively. WHtR, BMI, WC and WHR were significantly different among subjects who subsequently progressed to isolated IFG or IGT, IFG+IGT or NDDM (p<0.05). The anthropometric characteristics of IFG+IGT subjects were similar to those of the NDDM population (p>0.005). All the baseline anthropometric measurements were useful for the prediction of future prediabetes and NDDM (p<0.05). The optimal thresholds for the four measurements were calculated for the prediction of hyperglycaemia, with a WHtR value of 0.52 performing best to identify isolated IFG or IGT, IFG+IGT and NDDM.

Conclusions: Anthropometric measures, especially WHtR, could be used to predict hyperglycaemia 3 years in advance. Distinct from isolated IFG and IGT, the individuals who developed combined IFG+IGT had identical anthropometric profiles to those who progressed to NDDM.

Citing Articles

Role of waist circumferencetoheight ratio in assessing adiposity, predicting type 2 diabetes mellitus and other cardiometabolic diseases.

Zhang X, Lu X, Pan X, Shen S, Tong N Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025; 49(7):1062-1072.

PMID: 39788494 PMC: 11495984. DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.240259.


Cost-effectiveness of two screening strategies based on Chinese diabetes risk score for pre-diabetes in China.

Hao J, Yao Q, Lin Y, Sun Y, Zhang B, Hu M Front Public Health. 2022; 10:1018084.

PMID: 36530668 PMC: 9747942. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1018084.


Data mining approaches for type 2 diabetes mellitus prediction using anthropometric measurements.

Saberi-Karimian M, Mansoori A, Mohammadi Bajgiran M, Hosseini Z, Kiyoumarsioskouei A, Rad E J Clin Lab Anal. 2022; 37(1):e24798.

PMID: 36510349 PMC: 9833979. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24798.


Interaction analysis of lipid accumulation product and family history of diabetes on impaired fasting glucose and diabetes risk in population with normotension in Eastern China: a community-based cross-sectional survey.

Shu L, Zhao Y, Shen Y, Jia L, Zhang J Arch Public Health. 2022; 80(1):217.

PMID: 36183132 PMC: 9526958. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-022-00972-6.


Risk factors for hypertension and diabetes comorbidity in a Korean population: A cross-sectional study.

Chi J, Lee B PLoS One. 2022; 17(1):e0262757.

PMID: 35045123 PMC: 8769319. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262757.


References
1.
Lindstrom J, Tuomilehto J . The diabetes risk score: a practical tool to predict type 2 diabetes risk. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26(3):725-31. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.725. View

2.
MacKay M, Haffner S, Wagenknecht L, DAgostino Jr R, Hanley A . Prediction of type 2 diabetes using alternate anthropometric measures in a multi-ethnic cohort: the insulin resistance atherosclerosis study. Diabetes Care. 2009; 32(5):956-8. PMC: 2671128. DOI: 10.2337/dc08-1663. View

3.
Lyssenko V, Almgren P, Anevski D, Perfekt R, Lahti K, Nissen M . Predictors of and longitudinal changes in insulin sensitivity and secretion preceding onset of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2004; 54(1):166-74. DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.54.1.166. View

4.
Chen L, Magliano D, Balkau B, Colagiuri S, Zimmet P, Tonkin A . AUSDRISK: an Australian Type 2 Diabetes Risk Assessment Tool based on demographic, lifestyle and simple anthropometric measures. Med J Aust. 2010; 192(4):197-202. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03507.x. View

5.
Mohan V, Sandeep S, Deepa M, Gokulakrishnan K, Datta M, Deepa R . A diabetes risk score helps identify metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk in Indians - the Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study (CURES-38). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2007; 9(3):337-43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2006.00612.x. View