» Articles » PMID: 29740082

Transcriptome Analyses Reveal Reduced Hepatic Lipid Synthesis and Accumulation in More Feed Efficient Beef Cattle

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2018 May 10
PMID 29740082
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The genetic mechanisms controlling residual feed intake (RFI) in beef cattle are still largely unknown. Here we performed whole transcriptome analyses to identify differentially expressed (DE) genes and their functional roles in liver tissues between six extreme high and six extreme low RFI steers from three beef breed populations including Angus, Charolais, and Kinsella Composite (KC). On average, the next generation sequencing yielded 34 million single-end reads per sample, of which 87% were uniquely mapped to the bovine reference genome. At false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 and fold change (FC) > 2, 72, 41, and 175 DE genes were identified in Angus, Charolais, and KC, respectively. Most of the DE genes were breed-specific, while five genes including TP53INP1, LURAP1L, SCD, LPIN1, and ENSBTAG00000047029 were common across the three breeds, with TP53INP1, LURAP1L, SCD, and LPIN1 being downregulated in low RFI steers of all three breeds. The DE genes are mainly involved in lipid, amino acid and carbohydrate metabolism, energy production, molecular transport, small molecule biochemistry, cellular development, and cell death and survival. Furthermore, our differential gene expression results suggest reduced hepatic lipid synthesis and accumulation processes in more feed efficient beef cattle of all three studied breeds.

Citing Articles

Relationship between the rumen microbiome and liver transcriptome in beef cattle divergent for feed efficiency.

Keogh K, Kenny D, Alexandre P, Waters S, McGovern E, McGee M Anim Microbiome. 2024; 6(1):52.

PMID: 39304935 PMC: 11414306. DOI: 10.1186/s42523-024-00337-0.


Effect of breed and dietary composition on the miRNA profile of beef steers divergent for feed efficiency.

Keogh K, McGee M, Kenny D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):20046.

PMID: 39209905 PMC: 11362461. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70669-z.


Characterization of rumen microbiome and immune genes expression of crossbred beef steers with divergent residual feed intake phenotypes.

Taiwo G, Morenikeji O, Idowu M, Sidney T, Adekunle A, Cervantes A BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):245.

PMID: 38443809 PMC: 10913640. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10150-3.


An across breed, diet and tissue analysis reveals the transcription factor NR1H3 as a key mediator of residual feed intake in beef cattle.

Keogh K, Kenny D, Alexandre P, McGee M, Reverter A BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):234.

PMID: 38438858 PMC: 10910725. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10151-2.


Analyses of plasma metabolites using a high performance four-channel CIL LC-MS method and identification of metabolites associated with enteric methane emissions in beef cattle.

Li H, Wang X, Vinsky M, Manafiazar G, Fitzsimmons C, Li L PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0299268.

PMID: 38427676 PMC: 10906882. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299268.


References
1.
Anders S, Pyl P, Huber W . HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2014; 31(2):166-9. PMC: 4287950. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. View

2.
de Oliveira P, Cesar A, do Nascimento M, Chaves A, Tizioto P, Tullio R . Identification of genomic regions associated with feed efficiency in Nelore cattle. BMC Genet. 2014; 15:100. PMC: 4198703. DOI: 10.1186/s12863-014-0100-0. View

3.
Nascimento M, Souza A, Chaves A, Cesar A, Tullio R, Medeiros S . Feed efficiency indexes and their relationships with carcass, non-carcass and meat quality traits in Nellore steers. Meat Sci. 2016; 116:78-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.01.012. View

4.
Robinson M, McCarthy D, Smyth G . edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2009; 26(1):139-40. PMC: 2796818. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616. View

5.
Salter A . Improving the sustainability of global meat and milk production. Proc Nutr Soc. 2016; 76(1):22-27. DOI: 10.1017/S0029665116000276. View