Test-retest Reliability, Validity, and Minimum Detectable Change of Visual Analog, Numerical Rating, and Verbal Rating Scales for Measurement of Osteoarthritic Knee Pain

Overview

Journal J Pain Res

Publisher Dove Medical Press

Date 2018 May 8

PMID 29731662

Citations 226

Authors

Ahmad H Alghadir

Shahnawaz Anwer

Amir Iqbal

Zaheen Ahmed Iqbal

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: Several scales are commonly used for assessing pain intensity. Among them, the numerical rating scale (NRS), visual analog scale (VAS), and verbal rating scale (VRS) are often used in clinical practice. However, no study has performed psychometric analyses of their reliability and validity in the measurement of osteoarthritic (OA) pain. Therefore, the present study examined the test-retest reliability, validity, and minimum detectable change (MDC) of the VAS, NRS, and VRS for the measurement of OA knee pain. In addition, the correlations of VAS, NRS, and VRS with demographic variables were evaluated.

Methods: The study included 121 subjects (65 women, 56 men; aged 40-80 years) with OA of the knee. Test-retest reliability of the VAS, NRS, and VRS was assessed during two consecutive visits in a 24 h interval. The validity was tested using Pearson's correlation coefficients between the baseline scores of VAS, NRS, and VRS and the demographic variables (age, body mass index [BMI], sex, and OA grade). The standard error of measurement (SEM) and the MDC were calculated to assess statistically meaningful changes.

Results: The intraclass correlation coefficients of the VAS, NRS, and VRS were 0.97, 0.95, and 0.93, respectively. VAS, NRS, and VRS were significantly related to demographic variables (age, BMI, sex, and OA grade). The SEM of VAS, NRS, and VRS was 0.03, 0.48, and 0.21, respectively. The MDC of VAS, NRS, and VRS was 0.08, 1.33, and 0.58, respectively.

Conclusion: All the three scales had excellent test-retest reliability. However, the VAS was the most reliable, with the smallest errors in the measurement of OA knee pain.

Citing Articles

Comparison of the Effect of High-Intensity Laser Therapy and Quadriceps Muscle Strengthening Exercises Using Biofeedback on Pain, Stiffness and Function of Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Rahimi M, Jafari-Nozad A, Jazebi F Anesth Pain Med. 2025; 14(6):e143642.

PMID: 40078642 PMC: 11895785. DOI: 10.5812/aapm-143642.

Peak alpha frequency is related to the degree of widespread pain, but not pain intensity or duration, among people with urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome.

Cavaleri R, McLain N, Heindel M, Schrepf A, Rodriguez L, Kutch J Pain Rep. 2025; 10(2):e1251.

PMID: 40078419 PMC: 11902939. DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001251.

Improving pain, function and quality of life in end-stage knee osteoarthritis: a patient-preference cohort study on whole-body vibration and exercise as bridging therapies for total knee replacement.

Choi K, Chau W, Li L, Ng S, Lo B, Ong M Arthroplasty. 2025; 7(1):16.

PMID: 40059198 PMC: 11892224. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-025-00301-6.

Efficacy of adding mobilization and balance exercises to a home-based exercise program in patients with ankle disability: a randomized controlled trial.

Eladl H, Elsherbini D, Elshorbagy R, Ibrahim A, El-Sherbiny M, Ibrahim S Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 12:1512587.

PMID: 40046922 PMC: 11880611. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1512587.

Establishing metrics of clinically meaningful change for treating knee osteoarthritis with a combination of autologous orthobiologics.

Centeno C, Ghattas J, Dodson E, Steinmetz N, Murphy M, Berger D Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7244.

PMID: 40021765 PMC: 11871318. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91972-3.

References

Hawker G, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M . Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain.... Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012; 63 Suppl 11:S240-52. DOI: 10.1002/acr.20543. View

Kellgren J, Lawrence J . Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957; 16(4):494-502. PMC: 1006995. DOI: 10.1136/ard.16.4.494. View

Bezalel T, Carmeli E, Katz-Leurer M . The effect of a group education programme on pain and function through knowledge acquisition and home-based exercise among patients with knee osteoarthritis: a parallel randomised single-blind clinical trial. Physiotherapy. 2010; 96(2):137-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2009.09.009. View

Lydick E, Epstein R . Interpretation of quality of life changes. Qual Life Res. 1993; 2(3):221-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF00435226. View

Childs J, Piva S, Fritz J . Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(11):1331-4. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000164099.92112.29. View

Chaipinyo K, Karoonsupcharoen O . No difference between home-based strength training and home-based balance training on pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised trial. Aust J Physiother. 2009; 55(1):25-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0004-9514(09)70057-1. View

Hartrick C, Kovan J, Shapiro S . The numeric rating scale for clinical pain measurement: a ratio measure?. Pain Pract. 2006; 3(4):310-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-7085.2003.03034.x. View

Averbuch M, Katzper M . Assessment of visual analog versus categorical scale for measurement of osteoarthritis pain. J Clin Pharmacol. 2004; 44(4):368-72. DOI: 10.1177/0091270004263995. View

Hopkins W . Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med. 2000; 30(1):1-15. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001. View

10.

Williamson A, Hoggart B . Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005; 14(7):798-804. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x. View

11.

Gallasch C, Alexandre N . The measurement of musculoskeletal pain intensity: a comparison of four methods. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2007; 28(2):260-5. View

12.

Lund I, Lundeberg T, Sandberg L, Budh C, Kowalski J, Svensson E . Lack of interchangeability between visual analogue and verbal rating pain scales: a cross sectional description of pain etiology groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005; 5:31. PMC: 1274324. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-31. View

13.

Seymour R . The use of pain scales in assessing the efficacy of analgesics in post-operative dental pain. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1982; 23(5):441-4. DOI: 10.1007/BF00605995. View

14.

Dijkers M . Comparing quantification of pain severity by verbal rating and numeric rating scales. J Spinal Cord Med. 2010; 33(3):232-42. PMC: 2920116. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2010.11689700. View

15.

Bashir M, Khade A, Borkar P, Saleem M, Lingaswamy V, Reddy D . A comparative study between different pain rating scales in patients of osteoarthritis. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2014; 57(2):205-8. View

16.

Bellamy N, Campbell J, Syrotuik J . Comparative study of self-rating pain scales in osteoarthritis patients. Curr Med Res Opin. 1999; 15(2):113-9. DOI: 10.1185/03007999909113371. View

17.

Chanques G, Viel E, Constantin J, Jung B, de Lattre S, Carr J . The measurement of pain in intensive care unit: comparison of 5 self-report intensity scales. Pain. 2010; 151(3):711-721. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.08.039. View

18.

Chien C, Bagraith K, Khan A, Deen M, Strong J . Comparative responsiveness of verbal and numerical rating scales to measure pain intensity in patients with chronic pain. J Pain. 2013; 14(12):1653-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.08.006. View

19.

Bruce-Brand R, Walls R, Ong J, Emerson B, OByrne J, Moyna N . Effects of home-based resistance training and neuromuscular electrical stimulation in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012; 13:118. PMC: 3493368. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-118. View

20.

Wyrwich K, Wolinsky F . Identifying meaningful intra-individual change standards for health-related quality of life measures. J Eval Clin Pract. 2000; 6(1):39-49. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00238.x. View