» Articles » PMID: 29729947

A Critical Period for Second Language Acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 Million English Speakers

Overview
Journal Cognition
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychology
Date 2018 May 7
PMID 29729947
Citations 77
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Children learn language more easily than adults, though when and why this ability declines have been obscure for both empirical reasons (underpowered studies) and conceptual reasons (measuring the ultimate attainment of learners who started at different ages cannot by itself reveal changes in underlying learning ability). We address both limitations with a dataset of unprecedented size (669,498 native and non-native English speakers) and a computational model that estimates the trajectory of underlying learning ability by disentangling current age, age at first exposure, and years of experience. This allows us to provide the first direct estimate of how grammar-learning ability changes with age, finding that it is preserved almost to the crux of adulthood (17.4 years old) and then declines steadily. This finding held not only for "difficult" syntactic phenomena but also for "easy" syntactic phenomena that are normally mastered early in acquisition. The results support the existence of a sharply-defined critical period for language acquisition, but the age of offset is much later than previously speculated. The size of the dataset also provides novel insight into several other outstanding questions in language acquisition.

Citing Articles

Patient-Physician Language Concordance and Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Patients With Hypertension.

Reaume M, Labossiere M, Batista R, Van Haute S, Tangri N, Rigatto C JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(2):e2460551.

PMID: 39969882 PMC: 11840650. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.60551.


The impact of typological similarities and differences between German and Italian on the acquisition of language-specific phonetic cues in bilingual children: insights from the T-complex.

Bloder T, Shinohara Y, Rinker T, Shafer V Front Hum Neurosci. 2025; 18:1482052.

PMID: 39764361 PMC: 11701155. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1482052.


Webcams as Windows to the Mind? A Direct Comparison Between In-Lab and Web-Based Eye-Tracking Methods.

Slim M, Kandel M, Yacovone A, Snedeker J Open Mind (Camb). 2024; 8:1369-1424.

PMID: 39654819 PMC: 11627531. DOI: 10.1162/opmi_a_00171.


Foreign language talker identification does not generalize to new talkers.

Lee J, Tin J, Perrachione T Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; .

PMID: 39441473 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02598-x.


Creating a diagnostic assessment model for autism spectrum disorder by differentiating lexicogrammatical choices through machine learning.

Kato S, Hanawa K, Saito M, Nakamura K PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0311209.

PMID: 39331681 PMC: 11432897. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311209.


References
1.
Rowland C, Pine J . Subject-auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition: 'what children do know'?. J Child Lang. 2000; 27(1):157-81. DOI: 10.1017/s0305000999004055. View

2.
Mayberry R, Lock E, Kazmi H . Linguistic ability and early language exposure. Nature. 2002; 417(6884):38. DOI: 10.1038/417038a. View

3.
Hakuta K, Bialystok E, Wiley E . Critical evidence: a test of the critical-period hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychol Sci. 2003; 14(1):31-8. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.01415. View

4.
Kidd E, Bavin E . English-speaking children's comprehension of relative clauses: evidence for general-cognitive and language-specific constraints on development. J Psycholinguist Res. 2003; 31(6):599-617. DOI: 10.1023/a:1021265021141. View

5.
Mayberry R, Lock E . Age constraints on first versus second language acquisition: evidence for linguistic plasticity and epigenesis. Brain Lang. 2003; 87(3):369-84. DOI: 10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00137-8. View