Impact of Consumer Power on Consumers' Reactions to Corporate Transgression

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2018 May 4

PMID 29723306

Authors

Takaaki Hashimoto

Kaori Karasawa

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

We addressed how individuals' power influences their judgments regarding corporate transgressions. Based on the Situated Focus Theory of Power, which theorizes that powerful people respond more in accordance to circumstantial factors, we tested the interaction of power and the type of corporate discourse offered by the accused company. Across two studies (overall N = 216), we experimentally primed power (Study 1) and manipulated participants' sense of direct control over the company (Study 2). We consistently found an interaction effect of power and corporate discourse on people's negative attitudes toward the company-particularly on the unwillingness to use the company's products. Particularly, high-power individuals were prone to strongly vary their attitudes based on the mitigative/non-mitigative nature of the discourse, while those low in power were unsusceptible to the type of discourse. The results suggest how the potential rise of consumer power in society may critically influence the consumer-corporate relationships following corporate transgressions.

References

Guinote A . Power and affordances: when the situation has more power over powerful than powerless individuals. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008; 95(2):237-52. DOI: 10.1037/a0012518. View

Anderson C, John O, Keltner D . The personal sense of power. J Pers. 2011; 80(2):313-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00734.x. View

Ohbuchi K, Kameda M, Agarie N . Apology as aggression control: its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989; 56(2):219-27. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.56.2.219. View

Barton M, Yeatts P, Henson R, Martin S . Moving Beyond Univariate Post-Hoc Testing in Exercise Science: A Primer on Descriptive Discriminate Analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2016; 87(4):365-375. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2016.1213352. View

Keltner D, Gruenfeld D, Anderson C . Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychol Rev. 2003; 110(2):265-84. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.2.265. View

Bargh J, Raymond P, Pryor J, Strack F . Attractiveness of the underling: an automatic power --> sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995; 68(5):768-81. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.68.5.768. View

Pronk T, Karremans J, Overbeek G, Vermulst A, Wigboldus D . What it takes to forgive: When and why executive functioning facilitates forgiveness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010; 98(1):119-31. DOI: 10.1037/a0017875. View

Schmitt M, Gollwitzer M, Forster N, Montada L . Effects of objective and subjective account components on forgiving. J Soc Psychol. 2004; 144(5):465-85. DOI: 10.3200/SOCP.144.5.465-486. View

McCullough M, Worthington Jr E, Rachal K . Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997; 73(2):321-36. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.73.2.321. View

10.

Philpot C, Hornsey M . What happens when groups say sorry: the effect of intergroup apologies on their recipients. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008; 34(4):474-87. DOI: 10.1177/0146167207311283. View

11.

Smith P, Jostmann N, Galinsky A, van Dijk W . Lacking power impairs executive functions. Psychol Sci. 2008; 19(5):441-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02107.x. View

12.

Wilkowski B, Robinson M, Troop-Gordon W . How does cognitive control reduce anger and aggression? The role of conflict monitoring and forgiveness processes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010; 98(5):830-40. DOI: 10.1037/a0018962. View

13.

Smith P, Bargh J . NONCONSCIOUS EFFECTS OF POWER ON BASIC APPROACH AND AVOIDANCE TENDENCIES. Soc Cogn. 2008; 26(1):1-24. PMC: 2435045. DOI: 10.1521/soco.2008.26.1.1. View

14.

Hirsh J, Galinsky A, Zhong C . Drunk, Powerful, and in the Dark: How General Processes of Disinhibition Produce Both Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 6(5):415-27. DOI: 10.1177/1745691611416992. View

15.

Galinsky A, Gruenfeld D, Magee J . From power to action. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003; 85(3):453-66. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453. View