» Articles » PMID: 29721701

Potable Water Reuse: What Are the Microbiological Risks?

Overview
Date 2018 May 4
PMID 29721701
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Of Review: With the increasing interest in recycling water for potable reuse purposes, it is important to understand the microbial risks associated with potable reuse. This review focuses on potable reuse systems that use high-level treatment and de facto reuse scenarios that include a quantifiable wastewater effluent component.

Recent Findings: In this article, we summarize the published human health studies related to potable reuse, including both epidemiology studies and quantitative microbial risk assessments (QMRA). Overall, there have been relatively few health-based studies evaluating the microbial risks associated with potable reuse. Several microbial risk assessments focused on risks associated with unplanned (or de facto) reuse, while others evaluated planned potable reuse, such as indirect potable reuse (IPR) or direct potable reuse (DPR). The reported QMRA-based risks for planned potable reuse varied substantially, indicating there is a need for risk assessors to use consistent input parameters and transparent assumptions, so that risk results are easily translated across studies. However, the current results overall indicate that predicted risks associated with planned potable reuse scenarios may be lower than those for de facto reuse scenarios. Overall, there is a clear need to carefully consider water treatment train choices when wastewater is a component of the drinking water supply (whether de facto, IPR, or DPR). More data from full-scale water treatment facilities would be helpful to quantify levels of viruses in raw sewage and reductions across unit treatment processes for both culturable and molecular detection methods.

Citing Articles

Microbial Treatment Targets for Potable and Nonpotable Water Reuse - A Comprehensive Update and Harmonization.

Jahne M, Schoen M, Garland J, Nappier S, Soller J Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2025; 11(11):1175-1181.

PMID: 39877124 PMC: 11770559. DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00512.


Persistence of sewage-associated genetic markers in advanced and conventional treated recycled water: implications for microbial source tracking in surface waters.

Lobos A, Brandt A, Gallard-Gongora J, Korde R, Brodrick E, Harwood V mBio. 2024; 15(7):e0065524.

PMID: 38864636 PMC: 11253620. DOI: 10.1128/mbio.00655-24.


A unit process log reduction database for water reuse practitioners.

Arden S, McGaughy K, Phillips J, Hills L, Chiang E, Dumler S Water Res X. 2024; 23:100226.

PMID: 38765690 PMC: 11101967. DOI: 10.1016/j.wroa.2024.100226.


Water, Water Everywhere, but Every Drop Unique: Challenges in the Science to Understand the Role of Contaminants of Emerging Concern in the Management of Drinking Water Supplies.

Glassmeyer S, Burns E, Focazio M, Furlong E, Gribble M, Jahne M Geohealth. 2023; 7(12):e2022GH000716.

PMID: 38155731 PMC: 10753268. DOI: 10.1029/2022GH000716.


The Protective Effect of Virus Capsids on RNA and DNA Virus Genomes in Wastewater.

Harrison K, Snead D, Kilts A, Ammerman M, Wigginton K Environ Sci Technol. 2023; 57(37):13757-13766.

PMID: 37656816 PMC: 10516120. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c03814.


References
1.
Sinclair M, OToole J, Forbes A, Carr D, Leder K . Health status of residents of an urban dual reticulation system. Int J Epidemiol. 2010; 39(6):1667-75. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyq152. View

2.
Soller J, Eftim S, Nappier S . Direct potable reuse microbial risk assessment methodology: Sensitivity analysis and application to State log credit allocations. Water Res. 2017; 128:286-292. PMC: 6816270. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.10.034. View

3.
Blatchley 3rd E, Gong W, Alleman J, Rose J, Huffman D, Otaki M . Effects of wastewater disinfection on waterborne bacteria and viruses. Water Environ Res. 2007; 79(1):81-92. DOI: 10.2175/106143006x102024. View

4.
Blaschke A, Derx J, Zessner M, Kirnbauer R, Kavka G, Strelec H . Setback distances between small biological wastewater treatment systems and drinking water wells against virus contamination in alluvial aquifers. Sci Total Environ. 2016; 573:278-289. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.075. View

5.
Chaudhry R, Hamilton K, Haas C, Nelson K . Drivers of Microbial Risk for Direct Potable Reuse and de Facto Reuse Treatment Schemes: The Impacts of Source Water Quality and Blending. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14(6). PMC: 5486321. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14060635. View