» Articles » PMID: 29719428

Factors Associated with Imaging in Patients with Early Breast Cancer After Initial Treatment

Overview
Journal Curr Oncol
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 May 3
PMID 29719428
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Overuse of surveillance imaging in patients after curative treatment for early breast cancer (ebc) was recently identified as one of the Choosing Wisely Canada initiatives to improve the quality of cancer care. We undertook a population-level examination of imaging practices in Ontario as they existed before the launch of that initiative.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with ebc between 2006 and 2010 in Ontario were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry. Records were linked deterministically to provincial health care databases to obtain comprehensive follow-up. We identified all advanced imaging exams [aies: computed tomography (ct), bone scan, positron-emission tomography] and basic imaging exams (bies: ultrasonography, chest radiography) occurring within the first 2 years after curative treatment. Poisson regression was used to assess associations between patient or provider characteristics and the rate of aies.

Results: Of 30,006 women with ebc, 58.6% received at least 1 bie, and 30.6% received at least 1 aie in year 1 after treatment. In year 2, 52.7% received at least 1 bie, and 25.7% received at least 1 aie. The most common aies were chest cts and bone scans. The rate of aies increased with older age, higher disease stage, comorbidity, chemotherapy exposure, and prior staging investigations ( < 0.001). Imaging was ordered mainly by medical oncologists (38%), followed by primary care physicians (23%), surgeons (13%), and emergency room physicians (7%).

Conclusions: Despite recommendations against its use, imaging is common in ebc survivors. Understanding the factors associated with aie use helps to identify areas for further research and is required to lower imaging rates and to improve survivorship care.

Citing Articles

Clinical Impact of ASCO Choosing Wisely Guidelines on Staging Imaging for Early-Stage Breast Cancers: A Time Series Analysis Using SEER-Medicare Data.

Baltz A, Siegel E, Kamal A, Siegel R, Kozlik M, Crist S JCO Oncol Pract. 2022; 19(2):e274-e285.

PMID: 36375114 PMC: 9970287. DOI: 10.1200/OP.22.00500.


Evaluating potential overuse of surveillance care in cancer survivors.

Sheng J, Snyder C, Smith K, DeSanto J, Mayonado N, Rall S Cancer Med. 2022; 12(5):6139-6147.

PMID: 36369671 PMC: 10028154. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5346.


Use of Routine Health Datasets to Assess the Appropriateness of Diagnostic Tests in the Follow-Up of Breast Cancer Patients: A Population-Based Study on 3930 Patients.

Gion M, Cardinali G, Guzzinati S, Morandi P, Trevisiol C, Fabricio A Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022; 15:1087-1100.

PMID: 35615584 PMC: 9126654. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S342072.


De-implementing low-value care in cancer care delivery: a systematic review.

Tabriz A, Turner K, Clary A, Hong Y, Nguyen O, Wei G Implement Sci. 2022; 17(1):24.

PMID: 35279182 PMC: 8917720. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-022-01197-5.


Adherence to post-surgery follow-up assessment and its association with sociodemographic and disease characteristics in patients with breast cancer in Central China.

Feng R, Jing J, Zhang X, Li M, Gao J BMC Cancer. 2020; 20(1):1098.

PMID: 33183247 PMC: 7659108. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07600-y.


References
1.
Liberati A . The GIVIO trial on the impact of follow-up care on survival and quality of life in breast cancer patients. Interdisciplinary Group for Cancer Care Evaluation. Ann Oncol. 1995; 6 Suppl 2:41-6. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/6.suppl_2.s41. View

2.
Poonacha T, Go R . Level of scientific evidence underlying recommendations arising from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 29(2):186-91. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.6414. View

3.
Jiang L, Lofters A, Moineddin R, Decker K, Groome P, Kendell C . Primary care physician use across the breast cancer care continuum: CanIMPACT study using Canadian administrative data. Can Fam Physician. 2016; 62(10):e589-e598. PMC: 5063785. View

4.
Daly C, Urbach D, Stukel T, Nathan P, Deitel W, Paszat L . Patterns of diagnostic imaging and associated radiation exposure among long-term survivors of young adult cancer: a population-based cohort study. BMC Cancer. 2015; 15:612. PMC: 4559270. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1578-1. View

5.
Smith S, Singh-Carlson S, Downie L, Payeur N, Wai E . Survivors of breast cancer: patient perspectives on survivorship care planning. J Cancer Surviv. 2011; 5(4):337-44. DOI: 10.1007/s11764-011-0185-7. View