» Articles » PMID: 29716275

Amplitude Modulation Detection with a Short-duration Carrier: Effects of a Precursor and Hearing Loss

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2018 May 3
PMID 29716275
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study tests the hypothesis that amplitude modulation (AM) detection will be better under conditions where basilar membrane (BM) response growth is expected to be linear rather than compressive. This hypothesis was tested by (1) comparing AM detection for a tonal carrier as a function of carrier level for subjects with and without cochlear hearing impairment (HI), and by (2) comparing AM detection for carriers presented with and without an ipsilateral notched-noise precursor, under the assumption that the precursor linearizes BM responses. Average AM detection thresholds were approximately 5 dB better for subjects with HI than for subjects with normal hearing (NH) at moderate-level carriers. Average AM detection for low-to-moderate level carriers was approximately 2 dB better with the precursor than without the precursor for subjects with NH, whereas precursor effects were absent or smaller for subjects with HI. Although effect sizes were small and individual differences were noted, group differences are consistent with better AM detection for conditions where BM responses are less compressive due to cochlear hearing loss or due to a reduction in cochlear gain. These findings suggest the auditory system may quickly adjust to the local soundscape to increase effective AM depth and improve signal-to-noise ratios.

Citing Articles

Impaired noise adaptation contributes to speech intelligibility problems in people with hearing loss.

Marrufo-Perez M, Fumero M, Eustaquio-Martin A, Lopez-Poveda E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):28807.

PMID: 39567602 PMC: 11579485. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80131-9.


Relating monaural and binaural measures of modulation sensitivity in listeners with and without hearing loss.

Best V, Conroy C J Acoust Soc Am. 2024; 156(3):1543-1551.

PMID: 39235271 PMC: 11379497. DOI: 10.1121/10.0028517.


Temporal Envelope Coding of the Human Auditory Nerve Inferred from Electrocochleography: Comparison with Envelope Following Responses.

Chen J, Jennings S J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2022; 23(6):803-814.

PMID: 35948693 PMC: 9789235. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-022-00865-z.


Effects of Hearing Loss on Interaural Time Difference Sensitivity at Low and High Frequencies.

Best V, Baltzell L, Colburn H Trends Hear. 2022; 26:23312165221095357.

PMID: 35754372 PMC: 9244940. DOI: 10.1177/23312165221095357.


The effect of broadband elicitor laterality on psychoacoustic gain reduction across signal frequency.

Salloom W, Strickland E J Acoust Soc Am. 2021; 150(4):2817.

PMID: 34717476 PMC: 8520488. DOI: 10.1121/10.0006662.


References
1.
Jennings S, Strickland E, Heinz M . Precursor effects on behavioral estimates of frequency selectivity and gain in forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009; 125(4):2172-81. PMC: 2736734. DOI: 10.1121/1.3081383. View

2.
Plack C, OHanlon C . Forward masking additivity and auditory compression at low and high frequencies. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2003; 4(3):405-15. PMC: 3202736. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-002-3056-0. View

3.
Mertes I, Wilbanks E, Leek M . Olivocochlear Efferent Activity Is Associated With the Slope of the Psychometric Function of Speech Recognition in Noise. Ear Hear. 2017; 39(3):583-593. PMC: 5920700. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000514. View

4.
Warren 3rd E, Liberman M . Effects of contralateral sound on auditory-nerve responses. II. Dependence on stimulus variables. Hear Res. 1989; 37(2):105-21. DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(89)90033-6. View

5.
Roverud E, Strickland E . The time course of cochlear gain reduction measured using a more efficient psychophysical technique. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010; 128(3):1203-14. PMC: 2945748. DOI: 10.1121/1.3473695. View