» Articles » PMID: 29713159

The Impact of Exposure to Biomass Smoke Versus Cigarette Smoke on Inflammatory Markers and Pulmonary Function Parameters in Patients with Chronic Respiratory Failure

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2018 May 2
PMID 29713159
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of exposure to biomass smoke vs cigarette smoke on serum inflammatory markers and pulmonary function parameters in patients with chronic respiratory failure (CRF).

Patients And Methods: A total of 106 patients with CRF divided into age and gender-matched groups of cigarette-smoke exposure (n=55, mean [SD] age: 71.0 [12.0] years, 92.7% were females) and biomass smoke exposure (n=51, mean [SD] age: 73.0 [11.0] years, 94.1% were females) were included in this retrospective study. Data on patient demographics (age and gender), inflammatory markers, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, platelet/mean platelet volume ratio, arterial blood gas analysis, and pulmonary function test findings, including forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV/FVC were obtained from medical records.

Results: Carbon dioxide partial pressure levels were significantly higher in the biomass smoke exposure than in the cigarette smoke exposure group (mean [SD] 51.0 [8.0] vs 47.0 [8.0] mmHg, =0.026, respectively). Spirometry revealed similarly low levels for FEV (%) (38.0 [16.0] vs 40.0 [12.0]%) and FVC (%) (45.0 [19.0] vs 39.0 [19.0]%) in cigarette-smoke and biomass smoke exposure groups, whereas biomass smoke exposure was associated with significantly higher FEV/FVC (75.0 [14.0] vs 58.0 [12.0]%, =0.001), lower FVC (mL) (mean [SD] 744.0 [410.0] vs 1,063.0 [592.0] mL, =0.035) and lower percentage of patients with FEV/FVC <70% (36.8% vs 82.0%, <0.001) than cigarette smoke exposure.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate similarly increased inflammatory markers and abnormally low pulmonary function test findings in both biomass smoke exposure and cigarette smoke exposure groups, emphasizing the adverse effects of biomass smoke exposure on lungs to be as significant as cigarette smoke exposure. Association of biomass smoke exposure with higher likelihood of FEV/FVC ratio of >70% and more prominent loss of vital capacity than cigarette smoke exposure seems to indicate the likelihood of at least 18 years of biomass exposure to be sufficiently high to be responsible for both obstructive and restrictive pulmonary diseases.

Citing Articles

Assessment of wood smoke induced pulmonary toxicity in normal- and chronic bronchitis-like bronchial and alveolar lung mucosa models at air-liquid interface.

Upadhyay S, Rahman M, Rinaldi S, Koelmel J, Lin E, Mahesh P Respir Res. 2024; 25(1):49.

PMID: 38245732 PMC: 10799428. DOI: 10.1186/s12931-024-02686-5.


A2M Serves as Promising Biomarker for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Xiao X, Cai W, Ding Z, Shi Y, Fan L, Zhang Q Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023; 18:683-692.

PMID: 37123074 PMC: 10145514. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S407491.


The Co-Occurrence of Anthracosis with Interstitial Lung Disease.

Zhai L, Yu W Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2022; 39(2):e2022012.

PMID: 36118547 PMC: 9437760. DOI: 10.36141/svdld.v39i2.11792.


Reduced forced vital capacity is independently associated with, aging, height and a poor socioeconomic status: a report from the Tunisian population-based BOLD study.

Hsan S, Lakhdar N, Harrabi I, Zaouali M, Burney P, Denguezli M BMC Pulm Med. 2022; 22(1):267.

PMID: 35818049 PMC: 9275164. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-022-02062-3.


A comparative analysis of biomass and clean fuel exposure on pulmonary function during cooking among rural women in Tamilnadu, India.

Rajinikanth S, Chitra M, Kannan N, Baskaran V, Krishnan M Bioinformation. 2022; 17(5):593-598.

PMID: 35095233 PMC: 8770405. DOI: 10.6026/97320630017593.


References
1.
Kara M, Bulut S, Tas F, Akkurt I, Seyfikli Z . Evaluation of pulmonary changes due to biomass fuels using high-resolution computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13(10):2372-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-1925-5. View

2.
Venkataraman C, Rao G . Emission factors of carbon monoxide and size-resolved aerosols from biofuel combustion. Environ Sci Technol. 2001; 35(10):2100-7. DOI: 10.1021/es001603d. View

3.
Mena M, Woll F, Cok J, Ferrufino J, Alfonso Accinelli R . Histopathological lung changes in children due to biomass fuel. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012; 185(6):687-8. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.185.6.687. View

4.
Behera D, Jindal S, Malhotra H . Ventilatory function in nonsmoking rural Indian women using different cooking fuels. Respiration. 1994; 61(2):89-92. DOI: 10.1159/000196313. View

5.
Di Napoli M, Elkind M, Godoy D, Singh P, Papa F, Popa-Wagner A . Role of C-reactive protein in cerebrovascular disease: a critical review. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2011; 9(12):1565-84. DOI: 10.1586/erc.11.159. View