Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI of Orbital and Anterior Visual Pathway Lesions
Overview
Affiliations
Purpose: The accurate diagnosis of orbital and anterior visual pathway lesions has clinical significance. We determined whether dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI could differentiate benign from malignant lesions and compared model-independent and model-dependent methods of data analysis.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI studies of 37 enhancing orbital and anterior visual pathway lesions. The data were processed using model-independent analysis and model-dependent analysis using a 2-compartment pharmacokinetic model. The time-signal intensity curve and semiquantitative parameters from the model-independent method (area under the curve [AUC] after the initial 60, 90, and 120 s; time to peak; maximum signal enhancement ratio; maximum slope of increase; and washout ratio) and the quantitative parameters from the model-dependent method (K, k, and v) were derived for comparison with pathologic diagnoses.
Results: The time-signal intensity curves demonstrated different perfusion characteristics and were classified into 4 types. All the lesions that demonstrated curve types 1 and 4 were benign, while type 3 lesions were significantly associated with malignancy (P = 0.001). AUC, AUC, AUC, and k were significantly lower in benign lesions than in malignant lesions (P = 0.020, 0.018, 0.015, and 0.018, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that AUC yielded the best diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64-0.96) in differentiating between benign and malignant lesions.
Conclusions: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI is useful in evaluating orbital and anterior visual pathway lesions. The model-independent analysis method is equivalent to the model-dependent method in differentiating benign from malignant lesions.
Clinico-radiological features of optic nerve sheath schwannoma: Review and illustrative case.
Quigley C, Tong J, Zhang A, Psaltis A, Selva D Eur J Ophthalmol. 2024; 35(2):456-465.
PMID: 39340435 PMC: 11852521. DOI: 10.1177/11206721241287575.
OShaughnessy E, Cossec C, Mambour N, Lecoeuvre A, Savatovsky J, Zmuda M AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024; 45(3):342-350.
PMID: 38453407 PMC: 11286117. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8131.
Pu J, Liang Y, He Q, Shao J, Zhou M, Xiang S Front Oncol. 2022; 12:809430.
PMID: 35359367 PMC: 8963367. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.809430.
Diagnostic Imaging Methods and Comparative Analysis of Orbital Cavernous Hemangioma.
Zhang L, Li X, Tang F, Gan L, Wei X Front Oncol. 2020; 10:577452.
PMID: 33072609 PMC: 7539693. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.577452.