» Articles » PMID: 29708982

FSI Simulation of CSF Hydrodynamic Changes in a Large Population of Non-communicating Hydrocephalus Patients During Treatment Process with Regard to Their Clinical Symptoms

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 May 1
PMID 29708982
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

3D fluid-structure interaction modelling was utilized for simulation of 13 normal subjects, 11 non-communicating hydrocephalus (NCH) patients at pre-treatment phase, and 3 patients at five post-treatment phases. Evaluation of ventricles volume and maximum CSF pressure (before shunting) following results validation indicated that these parameters were the most proper hydrodynamic indices and the NCH type doesn't have any significant effect on changes in two indices. The results confirmed an appropriate correlation between these indices although the correlation decreased slightly after the occurrence of disease. NCH raises the intensity of vortex and pulsatility (2.4 times) of CSF flow while the flow remains laminar. On day 18 after shunting, the CSF pressure decreased 81.0% and all clinical symptoms of patients vanished except for headache. Continuing this investigation during the treatment process showed that maximum CSF pressure is the most sensitive parameter to patients' clinical symptoms. Maximum CSF pressure has decreased proportional to the level of decrease in clinical symptoms and has returned close to the pressure range in normal subjects faster than other parameters and simultaneous with disappearance of patients' clinical symptoms (from day 81 after shunting). However, phase lag between flow rate and pressure gradient functions and the degree of CSF pulsatility haven't returned to normal subjects' conditions even 981 days after shunting and NCH has also caused a permanent volume change (of 20.1%) in ventricles. Therefore, patients have experienced a new healthy state in new hydrodynamic conditions after shunting and healing. Increase in patients' intracranial compliance was predicted with a more accurate non-invasive method than previous experimental methods up to more than 981 days after shunting. The changes in hydrodynamic parameters along with clinical reports of patients can help to gain more insight into the pathophysiology of NCH patients.

Citing Articles

Computational Fluid Dynamics of Cerebrospinal Fluid.

Fillingham P, Kurt M, Levendovszky S, Levitt M Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024; 1462:417-434.

PMID: 39523280 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-64892-2_25.


Cerebro-spinal flow pattern in the cervical subarachnoid space of healthy volunteers: Influence of the spinal cord morphology.

Leblond L, Sudres P, Evin M PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0290927.

PMID: 39186510 PMC: 11346662. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290927.


Optimization of number and range of shunt valve performance levels in infant hydrocephalus: a machine learning analysis.

Waterstraat M, Dehghan A, Gholampour S Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1352490.

PMID: 38562668 PMC: 10982383. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1352490.


Feasibility of assessing non-invasive intracranial compliance using FSI simulation-based and MR elastography-based brain stiffness.

Gholampour S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):6493.

PMID: 38499758 PMC: 10948846. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57250-4.


Editorial: Modeling and simulation of cerebrospinal fluid disorders.

Gholampour S Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1331170.

PMID: 38155926 PMC: 10753823. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1331170.


References
1.
Baledent O, Henry-Feugeas M, Idy-Peretti I . Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and relation with blood flow: a magnetic resonance study with semiautomated cerebrospinal fluid segmentation. Invest Radiol. 2001; 36(7):368-77. DOI: 10.1097/00004424-200107000-00003. View

2.
Tangen K, Leval R, Mehta A, Linninger A . Computational and In Vitro Experimental Investigation of Intrathecal Drug Distribution: Parametric Study of the Effect of Injection Volume, Cerebrospinal Fluid Pulsatility, and Drug Uptake. Anesth Analg. 2017; 124(5):1686-1696. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002011. View

3.
Sweetman B, Xenos M, Zitella L, Linninger A . Three-dimensional computational prediction of cerebrospinal fluid flow in the human brain. Comput Biol Med. 2011; 41(2):67-75. PMC: 3050671. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2010.12.001. View

4.
Lawley J, Levine B, Williams M, Malm J, Eklund A, Polaner D . Cerebral spinal fluid dynamics: effect of hypoxia and implications for high-altitude illness. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2015; 120(2):251-62. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00370.2015. View

5.
Stephensen H, Andersson N, Eklund A, Malm J, Tisell M, Wikkelso C . Objective B wave analysis in 55 patients with non-communicating and communicating hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005; 76(7):965-70. PMC: 1739729. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.039834. View