» Articles » PMID: 29707557

Prepsoas Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Deformity Surgery

Overview
Journal Ann Transl Med
Date 2018 May 1
PMID 29707557
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Interbody fusions are routinely used in deformity surgery to achieve both coronal and sagittal correction and attain increased fusion rates. Minimally invasive interbody techniques, including the prepsoas approach, are being utilized to decrease tissue disruption, blood loss, and patient morbidity with similar outcomes compared to traditional surgery. The prepsoas oblique lateral interbody fusion, accesses the spine between the iliac arteries or aorta and psoas muscle, and allows for exposure of the lumbar spine while avoiding some complications commonly seen with a direct lateral approach. Navigation can assist the surgeon for surgical planning, ensuring appropriate placement of the interbody graft, and with placement of posterior pedicle screws. In correctly selected patients, these minimally invasive procedures can achieve excellent deformity correction and outcomes.

Citing Articles

Commentary on "Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients....

Ju C Neurospine. 2023; 20(2):550-552.

PMID: 37401072 PMC: 10323331. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2346608.304.


Clinical results and complications associated with oblique lumbar interbody fusion technique.

Cheng C, Wang K, Zhang C, Wu H, Jian F Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9(1):16.

PMID: 33553309 PMC: 7859744. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-2159.


The Navigated Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Accuracy Rate, Effect on Surgical Time, and Complications.

Xi Z, Chou D, Mummaneni P, Burch S Neurospine. 2020; 17(1):260-267.

PMID: 32054142 PMC: 7136090. DOI: 10.14245/ns.1938358.179.

References
1.
Villard J, Ryang Y, Demetriades A, Reinke A, Behr M, Preuss A . Radiation exposure to the surgeon and the patient during posterior lumbar spinal instrumentation: a prospective randomized comparison of navigated versus non-navigated freehand techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014; 39(13):1004-9. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000351. View

2.
Zhang Y, White I, Potts E, Mobasser J, Chou D . Comparison Perioperative Factors During Minimally Invasive Pre-Psoas Lateral Interbody Fusion of the Lumbar Spine Using Either Navigation or Conventional Fluoroscopy. Global Spine J. 2017; 7(7):657-663. PMC: 5624381. DOI: 10.1177/2192568217716149. View

3.
Mobbs R, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao P . Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg. 2016; 1(1):2-18. PMC: 5039869. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05. View

4.
Glassman S, Hamill C, Bridwell K, Schwab F, Dimar J, Lowe T . The impact of perioperative complications on clinical outcome in adult deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(24):2764-70. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a7644. View

5.
Suk S, Chung E, Kim J, Kim S, Lee J, Choi W . Posterior vertebral column resection for severe rigid scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(14):1682-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000170590.21071.c1. View