» Articles » PMID: 29703897

The Signalling Game Between Plants and Pollinators

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2018 Apr 29
PMID 29703897
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Plants can send floral signals to advertise their reward for pollinators. Based on the presence or absents of such signals, pollinators can determine whether to visit plants. Plants can send dishonest signals but foraging behaviours of pollinators can limit the cheating strategies of plants. We model the plant-pollinator interactions by the two-type Spence signalling game and investigate the conditions under which honest signalling can be established. In our model, plants either send costly signal or they do not. The cost of signal is dependent on the quality of plant. Pollinators can learn from the interactions with plants and can update their willingness to visit plants' flowers to maximize their foraging efficiency. We find three general conditions that are required for the evolutionary stability of honest signaling. Those conditions are satisfied if there is (a) a high frequency of high-yield signalling plants in the population, (b) the balance between cost and benefit of signalling, and (c) high cost of dishonest signalling. Our model also predicts that other factors contributing to the establishment of honest signaling are the low abundance of pollinators, and the positive density-dependent and positive frequency-dependent relationship between plants and pollinators.

Citing Articles

The evolution of signaling and monitoring in plant-fungal networks.

Scott T, Kiers E, West S Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(4):e2420701122.

PMID: 39835901 PMC: 7617349. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2420701122.


Deciphering the ecology of the threatened microendemic species .

Llorens L, Cortes L, Boira H Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1155896.

PMID: 37434601 PMC: 10332272. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1155896.


Intraspecific relationships between floral signals and rewards with implications for plant fitness.

Essenberg C AoB Plants. 2021; 13(2):plab006.

PMID: 33708371 PMC: 7937183. DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plab006.


Evolution of honest reward signal in flowers.

Ito K, Suzuki M, Mochizuki K Proc Biol Sci. 2021; 288(1943):20202848.

PMID: 33467994 PMC: 7893275. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2848.


Fruit scent and observer colour vision shape food-selection strategies in wild capuchin monkeys.

Melin A, Nevo O, Shirasu M, Williamson R, Garrett E, Endo M Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):2407.

PMID: 31160592 PMC: 6546703. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10250-9.

References
1.
Benitez-Vieyra S, Ordano M, Fornoni J, Boege K, Dominguez C . Selection on signal–reward correlation: limits and opportunities to the evolution of deceit in Turnera ulmifolia L. J Evol Biol. 2010; 23(12):2760-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02132.x. View

2.
Gomez J, Bosch J, Perfectti F, Fernandez J, Abdelaziz M, Camacho J . Association between floral traits and rewards in Erysimum mediohispanicum (Brassicaceae). Ann Bot. 2008; 101(9):1413-20. PMC: 2710261. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcn053. View

3.
Lachmann M, Bergstrom C . Signalling among relatives. II. Beyond the tower of Babel. Theor Popul Biol. 1998; 54(2):146-60. DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.1997.1372. View

4.
Bolstad G, Armbruster W, Pelabon C, Perez-Barrales R, Hansen T . Direct selection at the blossom level on floral reward by pollinators in a natural population of Dalechampia schottii: full-disclosure honesty?. New Phytol. 2010; 188(2):370-84. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03429.x. View

5.
Pelabon C, Thone P, Hansen T, Armbruster W . Signal honesty and cost of pollinator rewards in Dalechampia scandens (Euphorbiaceae). Ann Bot. 2012; 109(7):1331-40. PMC: 3359932. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcs091. View