F-Alfatide II PET/CT for Identification of Breast Cancer: A Preliminary Clinical Study
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
F-alfatide II has been proven to have excellent clinical translational potential. In this study, we investigated F-alfatide II for identifying breast cancer and compared the performances between F-alfatide II and F-FDG. Forty-four female patients with suspected primary breast cancer were recruited. PET/CT images using F-alfatide II and F-FDG were acquired within 7 d. Tracer uptake in breast lesions was evaluated by visual analysis, and semiquantitative analysis with SUV and SUV Forty-two breast cancer lesions and 11 benign breast lesions were confirmed by histopathology in 44 patients. Both F-alfatide II and F-FDG had higher uptake in breast cancer lesions than in benign breast lesions ( < 0.05 for F-alfatide II, < 0.05 for F-FDG). The area under the curve of F-alfatide II was slightly less than that of F-FDG. Both F-alfatide II and F-FDG had high sensitivity (88.1% vs. 90.5%), high positive predictive value (88.1% vs. 88.4%), moderate specificity (54.5% vs. 54.5%), and moderate negative predictive value (54.5% vs. 60.0%) for differentiating breast cancer from benign breast lesions. By combining F-alfatide II and F-FDG, the sensitivity and negative predictive value significantly increased to 97.6% and 85.7%, respectively, with positive predictive value slightly increased to 89.1% and no change to the specificity (54.5%). The uptake of F-alfatide II (SUV: 3.77 ± 1.78) was significantly lower than that of F-FDG (SUV: 7.37 ± 4.48) in breast cancer lesions ( < 0.05). F-alfatide II uptake in triple-negative subtype was significantly lower than that in luminal A and luminal B subtypes. By contrast, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2)-overexpressing subtype had higher F-FDG uptake than the other 3 subtypes. There were 8 breast cancer lesions with higher F-alfatide II uptake than F-FDG uptake, which all had a common characteristic that HER-2 expression was negative and estrogen receptor expression was strongly positive. F-alfatide II is suitable for clinical use in breast cancer patients. F-alfatide II is of good performance, but not superior to F-FDG in identifying breast cancer. F-alfatide II may have superiority to F-FDG in detecting breast cancer with strongly positive estrogen receptor expression and negative HER-2 expression.
Head-to-head evaluation of [F]FDG PET/CT and [Ga]Ga-HX01 PET/MR in sarcoma patients.
Zhang X, Gai Y, Ye T, Fan L, Xiu L, Ruan W Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025; .
PMID: 39976700 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-025-07130-4.
Butt A, Bach H Nanomedicine (Lond). 2024; 20(2):183-206.
PMID: 39670826 PMC: 11730800. DOI: 10.1080/17435889.2024.2439778.
Theranostics in breast cancer.
Vorster M, Hadebe B, Sathekge M Front Nucl Med. 2024; 3:1236565.
PMID: 39355052 PMC: 11440857. DOI: 10.3389/fnume.2023.1236565.
Baniasadi A, Das J, Prendergast C, Beizavi Z, Ma H, Jaber M J Transl Med. 2024; 22(1):567.
PMID: 38872212 PMC: 11177383. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05379-1.
Micronutrient Status and Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review.
Forma A, Grunwald A, Zembala P, Januszewski J, Brachet A, Zembala R Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(9).
PMID: 38732186 PMC: 11084730. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25094968.