» Articles » PMID: 29700127

F-Alfatide II PET/CT for Identification of Breast Cancer: A Preliminary Clinical Study

Overview
Journal J Nucl Med
Specialty Nuclear Medicine
Date 2018 Apr 28
PMID 29700127
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

F-alfatide II has been proven to have excellent clinical translational potential. In this study, we investigated F-alfatide II for identifying breast cancer and compared the performances between F-alfatide II and F-FDG. Forty-four female patients with suspected primary breast cancer were recruited. PET/CT images using F-alfatide II and F-FDG were acquired within 7 d. Tracer uptake in breast lesions was evaluated by visual analysis, and semiquantitative analysis with SUV and SUV Forty-two breast cancer lesions and 11 benign breast lesions were confirmed by histopathology in 44 patients. Both F-alfatide II and F-FDG had higher uptake in breast cancer lesions than in benign breast lesions ( < 0.05 for F-alfatide II, < 0.05 for F-FDG). The area under the curve of F-alfatide II was slightly less than that of F-FDG. Both F-alfatide II and F-FDG had high sensitivity (88.1% vs. 90.5%), high positive predictive value (88.1% vs. 88.4%), moderate specificity (54.5% vs. 54.5%), and moderate negative predictive value (54.5% vs. 60.0%) for differentiating breast cancer from benign breast lesions. By combining F-alfatide II and F-FDG, the sensitivity and negative predictive value significantly increased to 97.6% and 85.7%, respectively, with positive predictive value slightly increased to 89.1% and no change to the specificity (54.5%). The uptake of F-alfatide II (SUV: 3.77 ± 1.78) was significantly lower than that of F-FDG (SUV: 7.37 ± 4.48) in breast cancer lesions ( < 0.05). F-alfatide II uptake in triple-negative subtype was significantly lower than that in luminal A and luminal B subtypes. By contrast, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2)-overexpressing subtype had higher F-FDG uptake than the other 3 subtypes. There were 8 breast cancer lesions with higher F-alfatide II uptake than F-FDG uptake, which all had a common characteristic that HER-2 expression was negative and estrogen receptor expression was strongly positive. F-alfatide II is suitable for clinical use in breast cancer patients. F-alfatide II is of good performance, but not superior to F-FDG in identifying breast cancer. F-alfatide II may have superiority to F-FDG in detecting breast cancer with strongly positive estrogen receptor expression and negative HER-2 expression.

Citing Articles

Head-to-head evaluation of [F]FDG PET/CT and [Ga]Ga-HX01 PET/MR in sarcoma patients.

Zhang X, Gai Y, Ye T, Fan L, Xiu L, Ruan W Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025; .

PMID: 39976700 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-025-07130-4.


Advancements in nanotechnology for diagnostics: a literature review, part II: advanced techniques in nuclear and optical imaging.

Butt A, Bach H Nanomedicine (Lond). 2024; 20(2):183-206.

PMID: 39670826 PMC: 11730800. DOI: 10.1080/17435889.2024.2439778.


Theranostics in breast cancer.

Vorster M, Hadebe B, Sathekge M Front Nucl Med. 2024; 3:1236565.

PMID: 39355052 PMC: 11440857. DOI: 10.3389/fnume.2023.1236565.


Imaging at the nexus: how state of the art imaging techniques can enhance our understanding of cancer and fibrosis.

Baniasadi A, Das J, Prendergast C, Beizavi Z, Ma H, Jaber M J Transl Med. 2024; 22(1):567.

PMID: 38872212 PMC: 11177383. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05379-1.


Micronutrient Status and Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review.

Forma A, Grunwald A, Zembala P, Januszewski J, Brachet A, Zembala R Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(9).

PMID: 38732186 PMC: 11084730. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25094968.


References
1.
Beer A, Niemeyer M, Carlsen J, Sarbia M, Nahrig J, Watzlowik P . Patterns of alphavbeta3 expression in primary and metastatic human breast cancer as shown by 18F-Galacto-RGD PET. J Nucl Med. 2008; 49(2):255-9. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.045526. View

2.
Jacobson O, Zhu L, Niu G, Weiss I, Szajek L, Ma Y . MicroPET imaging of integrin αvβ3 expressing tumors using 89Zr-RGD peptides. Mol Imaging Biol. 2010; 13(6):1224-33. PMC: 3137711. DOI: 10.1007/s11307-010-0458-y. View

3.
Beer A, Grosu A, Carlsen J, Kolk A, Sarbia M, Stangier I . [18F]galacto-RGD positron emission tomography for imaging of alphavbeta3 expression on the neovasculature in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Clin Cancer Res. 2007; 13(22 Pt 1):6610-6. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0528. View

4.
Danhier F, Le Breton A, Preat V . RGD-based strategies to target alpha(v) beta(3) integrin in cancer therapy and diagnosis. Mol Pharm. 2012; 9(11):2961-73. DOI: 10.1021/mp3002733. View

5.
Guo J, Lang L, Hu S, Guo N, Zhu L, Sun Z . Comparison of three dimeric 18F-AlF-NOTA-RGD tracers. Mol Imaging Biol. 2013; 16(2):274-83. DOI: 10.1007/s11307-013-0668-1. View