Predictive Factors for Missed Adenoma on Repeat Colonoscopy in Patients with Suboptimal Bowel Preparation on Initial Colonoscopy: A KASID Multicenter Study

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2018 Apr 27

PMID 29698398

Citations 14

Authors

Ji Young Chang

Chang Mo Moon

Hyun Jung Lee

Hyo-Joon Yang

Yunho Jung

Sang Wook Kim

Sung-Ae Jung

Jeong-Sik Byeon

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Suboptimal bowel preparation can result in missed colorectal adenoma that can evolve into interval colorectal cancer. This study aims to identify the predictive factors associated with missed adenoma on repeat colonoscopy in patients with suboptimal bowel preparation at initial colonoscopy. A total of 441 patients with suboptimal bowel preparation on initial colonoscopy and who had repeat colonoscopy within two years were included from 2007 to 2014 in six tertiary hospitals. Suboptimal bowel preparation was defined as 'poor' according to the Aronchick scale or a score ≤ 1 in at least one segment or total score < 6 according to the Boston bowel preparation scale. Of 441 patients, mean age at initial colonoscopy was 59.1 years, and 69.2% patients were male. The mean interval from initial to repeat colonoscopy was 14.1 months. The per-patient adenoma miss rate (AMR) was 42.4% for any adenoma and 5.4% for advanced adenoma. When the association between baseline clinical characteristics and missed lesions on repeat colonoscopy was analyzed, dyslipidemia (odds ratio [OR], 5.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-23.66; P = 0.034), and high-risk adenoma (OR, 4.45; 95% CI, 1.12-17.68; P = 0.034) on initial colonoscopy were independent risk factors for missed advanced adenoma. In patients with suboptimal bowel preparation, dyslipidemia and high-risk adenoma on initial colonoscopy were independently predictive of missed advanced adenoma on repeat colonoscopy.

Citing Articles

Using a Mobile Health App (ColonClean) to Enhance the Effectiveness of Bowel Preparation: Development and Usability Study.

Chen H, Tu M, Chen M JMIR Hum Factors. 2025; 12():e58479.

PMID: 39791869 PMC: 11735013. DOI: 10.2196/58479.

Association Between Longer Cecal Intubation Time and Detection and Miss Rate of Colorectal Neoplasms.

Choi J, Lim S, Han Y, Lee J, Jin E, Seo J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685539 PMC: 11642371. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237080.

Novel Approach to Continuation of Elective Procedures in People at Risk for Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor-Associated Euglycemic Ketoacidosis.

Verdone M, Bauman J, Iversen E, Schulman-Rosenbaum R, Antonacci A, Leffe S Diabetes Spectr. 2024; 37(2):165-169.

PMID: 38756433 PMC: 11093762. DOI: 10.2337/ds23-0040.

Boston bowel preparation scale score 6 has more missed lesions compared with 7-9.

Kim J, Choi J, Lee J, Han Y, Jin E, Lim J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):1605.

PMID: 38238553 PMC: 10796329. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52244-8.

Correlation between prescribing doctor attributes and intestinal cleanliness in colonoscopy: a study of 22522 patients.

Zhou H, Khizar H, Zhang X, Yang J Ann Med. 2023; 55(2):2262496.

PMID: 37751492 PMC: 10524780. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2262496.

References

Manser C, Bachmann L, Brunner J, Hunold F, Bauerfeind P, Marbet U . Colonoscopy screening markedly reduces the occurrence of colon carcinomas and carcinoma-related death: a closed cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 76(1):110-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.040. View

Xiang L, Zhan Q, Zhao X, Wang Y, An S, Xu Y . Risk factors associated with missed colorectal flat adenoma: a multicenter retrospective tandem colonoscopy study. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(31):10927-37. PMC: 4138473. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i31.10927. View

Rex D, Imperiale T, Latinovich D, Bratcher L . Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002; 97(7):1696-700. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05827.x. View

Lieberman D, Prindiville S, Weiss D, Willett W . Risk factors for advanced colonic neoplasia and hyperplastic polyps in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA. 2003; 290(22):2959-67. DOI: 10.1001/jama.290.22.2959. View

Giorgino F, Laviola L, Eriksson J . Regional differences of insulin action in adipose tissue: insights from in vivo and in vitro studies. Acta Physiol Scand. 2005; 183(1):13-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-201X.2004.01385.x. View

Fornasarig M, Valentini M, Poletti M, Carbone A, Bidoli E, Sozzi M . Evaluation of the risk for metachronous colorectal neoplasms following intestinal polypectomy: a clinical, endoscopic and pathological study. Hepatogastroenterology. 1998; 45(23):1565-72. View

Singhal S, Virk M, Momeni M, Krishnaiah M, Anand S . Impact of bowel preparation on surveillance colonoscopy interval. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014; 49(7):885-90. DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2014.915055. View

Rex D, Petrini J, Baron T, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal S . Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101(4):873-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00673.x. View

Ahn S, Han D, Bae J, Byun T, Kim J, Eun C . The Miss Rate for Colorectal Adenoma Determined by Quality-Adjusted, Back-to-Back Colonoscopies. Gut Liver. 2012; 6(1):64-70. PMC: 3286741. DOI: 10.5009/gnl.2012.6.1.64. View

10.

Yang P, Wong S . Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopy: Is Indication a Predictor?. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016; 26(2):156-61. DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000253. View

11.

Chokshi R, Hovis C, Hollander T, Early D, Wang J . Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75(6):1197-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.005. View

12.

Aranda-Hernandez J, Hwang J, Kandel G . Seeing better--Evidence based recommendations on optimizing colonoscopy adenoma detection rate. World J Gastroenterol. 2016; 22(5):1767-78. PMC: 4724608. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i5.1767. View

13.

Kulling D, Christ A, Karaaslan N, Fried M, Bauerfeind P . The presence of more than two index adenomas is the strongest predictor of metachronous colon adenomas. Swiss Med Wkly. 2002; 132(11-12):139-42. DOI: 10.4414/smw.2002.09877. View

14.

Jover R, Zapater P, Bujanda L, Hernandez V, Cubiella J, Pellise M . Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2016; 48(3):241-7. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-100185. View

15.

Lieberman D, Rex D, Winawer S, Giardiello F, Johnson D, Levin T . Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012; 143(3):844-857. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.06.001. View

16.

Lai E, Calderwood A, Doros G, Fix O, Jacobson B . The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69(3 Pt 2):620-5. PMC: 2763922. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.057. View

17.

Kim N, Jung Y, Jeong W, Yang H, Park S, Choi K . Miss rate of colorectal neoplastic polyps and risk factors for missed polyps in consecutive colonoscopies. Intest Res. 2017; 15(3):411-418. PMC: 5478767. DOI: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.3.411. View

18.

Hancock K, Mascarenhas R, Lieberman D . What Can We Do to Optimize Colonoscopy and How Effective Can We Be?. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2016; 18(6):27. DOI: 10.1007/s11894-016-0500-6. View

19.

Clark B, Protiva P, Nagar A, Imaeda A, Ciarleglio M, Deng Y . Quantification of Adequate Bowel Preparation for Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy in Men. Gastroenterology. 2015; 150(2):396-405. PMC: 4728019. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.041. View

20.

Corte C, Leong R . Improving the utility of colonoscopy: Recent advances in practice. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015; 31(1):32-44. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.13056. View