» Articles » PMID: 29693320

Sex Differences in Quality of Life in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Abstract

Objective: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) predominantly affects women. Clinical phenotype and outcomes in SLE may vary by sex and are further complicated by unique concerns that are dependent upon sex-defined roles. We aimed to describe sex differences in disease-specific quality of life (QoL) assessment scores using the Lupus Patient-Reported Outcome (LupusPRO) tool in a large international study.

Methods: Cross-sectional data from 1,803 patients with SLE on demographics, self-identified sex status, LupusPRO, and disease activity were analyzed. The LupusPRO tool has 2 constructs: health-related QoL (HRQoL) and non-HRQoL. Disease activity and damage were evaluated using the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment version of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index, respectively. Nonparametric tests were used to compare QoL and disease activity by sex.

Results: A total of 122 men and 1,681 women with SLE participated. The mean age was similar by sex, but the damage scores were greater among men. Men fared worse on the non-HRQoL social support domain than women (P = 0.02). When comparing disease and QoL among men and women ages ≤45 years, men were found to have greater damage and worse social support than women. However, women fared significantly worse on lupus symptoms, cognition, and procreation domains with trends for worse functioning on physical health and pain-vitality domains.

Conclusion: In the largest study of a diverse group of SLE patients, utilizing a disease-specific QoL tool, sex differences in QoL were observed on both HRQoL and non-HRQoL constructs. Although men performed worse in the social support domain, women (especially those in the reproductive age group) fared worse in other domains. These observations may assist physicians in appropriately addressing QoL issues in a sex-focused manner.

Citing Articles

Exploring the quality of life and comorbidity impact among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in Saudi Arabia.

Aljohani R, Aljanobi G, Alderaan K, Omair M Saudi Med J. 2024; 45(10):1071-1079.

PMID: 39379126 PMC: 11463565. DOI: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.10.20240432.


Gender Disparities in Hospitalization Outcomes and Healthcare Utilization Among Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in the United States.

Uwumiro F, Okpujie V, Osemwota O, Okafor N, Otu M, Borowa A Cureus. 2023; 15(7):e41254.

PMID: 37529818 PMC: 10389681. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41254.


Psychological Implications to the Therapy of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Warchol-Biedermann K, Mojs E, Sikorska D, Kotyla P, Teusz G, Samborski W Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(23).

PMID: 36498095 PMC: 9737561. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192316021.


Predictors of stress in patients with Lupus.

Jolly M, Katz P Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:986968.

PMID: 36250087 PMC: 9556948. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.986968.


The impact of distress disclosure and anxiety on the association between social support and quality of life among Chinese women with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Gao R, Wu L, Shi P, Sang N, Hao M, Wu G Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13:893235.

PMID: 35990077 PMC: 9385970. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.893235.


References
1.
Mayor A, Vila L . Gender differences in a cohort of Puerto Ricans with systemic lupus erythematosus. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2004; 49(8):1339-44. View

2.
Mok C, Ho L, Cheung M, Yu K, To C . Effect of disease activity and damage on quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a 2-year prospective study. Scand J Rheumatol. 2008; 38(2):121-7. DOI: 10.1080/03009740802415527. View

3.
Jolly M, Utset T . Can disease specific measures for systemic lupus erythematosus predict patients health related quality of life?. Lupus. 2005; 13(12):924-6. DOI: 10.1191/0961203304lu2034oa. View

4.
Park J, Choi M, Kim Y, Choi C, Choi S, Hong S . Quality of life of patients with irritable bowel syndrome in Korea. Qual Life Res. 2009; 18(4):435-46. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-009-9461-7. View

5.
Mazzoni D, Cicognani E . Positive and problematic support, stress and quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2015; 29(5):542-51. DOI: 10.1080/10615806.2015.1134785. View