» Articles » PMID: 29685425

Pre-treatment Verification of Lung SBRT VMAT Plans with Delivery Errors: Toward a Better Understanding of the Gamma Index Analysis

Overview
Journal Phys Med
Date 2018 Apr 25
PMID 29685425
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To study the sensitivity of the ArcCHECK in detecting delivery errors for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using the Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) technique and to evaluate the sensitivity of eight global and local gamma tolerances with different cut-off percentages.

Methods: Baseline VMAT plans were generated for 15 lung SBRT patients. We delivered the smallest errors(gantry, collimator, and multileaf collimator MLC) which had ≥ ±2% dose difference in the modified treatment plans compared to the baseline plan (the clinical significance of those errors were assessed in our previous study. A total of 100 plan in which 15 baseline plans were measured using the ArcCheck detector along with ion chamber measurements. The sensitivity of the global and local gamma-index method using criteria of 1%/1 mm, 2%/1 mm, 2%/2 mm, and 3%/3 mm was investigated.

Results: The gamma (γ) pass rates for these plans exhibited considerable spread. The majority of simulated errors were not detected. Broadly similar detection levels were achieved with the different gamma criteria and cut-offs. Combining ion chamber measurements with ArcCHECK did not improve error detection.

Conclusions: Commonly adopted gamma criteria are not sensitive enough to validate lung SBRT VMAT plans at the 2% dose difference level. The error detection levels are fairly consistent despite changes in gamma criteria and cut-offs. The choice of gamma criteria was not significant and there was no clear benefit in tightening the gamma criteria.

Citing Articles

Forecasting model for qualitative prediction of the results of patient-specific quality assurance based on planning and complexity metrics and their interrelations. Pilot study.

Piotrowski T, Ryczkowski A, Kalendralis P, Adamczewski M, Sadowski P, Bajon B Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2024; 29(3):318-328.

PMID: 39144260 PMC: 11321782. DOI: 10.5603/rpor.101093.


Isodose surface differences: A novel tool for the comparison of dose distributions.

Diamantopoulos S, Platoni K, Karaiskos P, Kouloulias V, Efstathopoulos E J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023; 24(11):e14085.

PMID: 37794700 PMC: 10647989. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14085.


Comparison of dosimetric effects of MLC positional errors on VMAT and IMRT plans for SBRT radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Deng J, Huang Y, Wu X, Hong Y, Zhao Y PLoS One. 2022; 17(12):e0278422.

PMID: 36454884 PMC: 9714892. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278422.


Assessment of Statistical Process Control Based DVH Action Levels for Systematic Multi-Leaf Collimator Errors in Cervical Cancer RapidArc Plans.

Zhang H, Lu W, Cui H, Li Y, Yi X Front Oncol. 2022; 12:862635.

PMID: 35664736 PMC: 9157499. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.862635.


Evaluation of the ability of three commercially available dosimeters to detect systematic delivery errors in step-and-shoot IMRT plans.

Gray A, Bawazeer O, Arumugam S, Vial P, Descallar J, Thwaites D Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2021; 26(5):793-803.

PMID: 34760314 PMC: 8575358. DOI: 10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0093.