» Articles » PMID: 29683459

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Overview
Journal J Vis Exp
Date 2018 Apr 24
PMID 29683459
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The protocol for the temptation resistance paradigm was designed to elicit 2- to 8-year-old children's strategic lie-telling behaviors. The reward of transgression was intended to be too tempting to resist, so that children's spontaneous lie-telling behavior in the presence of irreversible evidence due to the transgression could be observed. Conducted in a developmental psychology laboratory behind a one-way mirror and video recorded with a hidden camcorder, the protocol starts with a guessing game where the child is given three trials to guess the identities of hidden objects under an upside down cup. The experimenter gives hints in the first two trials to make sure the child "guess" them correctly. At the beginning of the final trial, the experimenter leaves the room briefly and asks the child not to peek under the cup. If the child could not resist the temptation and peeks, small particles previously filled in the cup would scatter on a grooved surface. Upon the experimenter's return, the child is asked if he/she has peeked. If he/she denies transgression contrary to the presence of the physical evidence, he/she is asked to explain why the particles are on the table. Three responses could be observed in the procedure, including the initial transgression, truth-telling or lie-telling behavior if the child peeked, and the strategic lie-telling behavior in the presence of the physical evidence.

References
1.
Wellman H, Cross D, Watson J . Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief. Child Dev. 2001; 72(3):655-84. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00304. View

2.
Talwar V, Lee K, Bala N, Lindsay R . Children's conceptual knowledge of lying and its relation to their actual behaviors: implications for court competence examinations. Law Hum Behav. 2002; 26(4):395-415. DOI: 10.1023/a:1016379104959. View

3.
Evans A, Xu F, Lee K . When all signs point to you: lies told in the face of evidence. Dev Psychol. 2011; 47(1):39-49. PMC: 3539818. DOI: 10.1037/a0020787. View

4.
Polak A, Harris P . Deception by young children following noncompliance. Dev Psychol. 1999; 35(2):561-8. DOI: 10.1037//0012-1649.35.2.561. View

5.
Wang L, Zhu L, Wang Z . Parental mind-mindedness but not false belief understanding predicts Hong Kong children's lie-telling behavior in a temptation resistance task. J Exp Child Psychol. 2017; 162:89-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.023. View