» Articles » PMID: 29681931

Development of a Physiological Frailty Index for the World Trade Center General Responder Cohort

Overview
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2018 Apr 24
PMID 29681931
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Responders to the 9/11/2001 WTC attacks were exposed to multiple toxic pollutants. Since 2002, the health of the responder cohort has been continuously tracked by the WTC Health Monitoring Program. However, no assessments have been made of frailty, an important health metric given the current average age of the WTC responder cohort (55 years). In this study, we use laboratory test results and other physiological parameters to construct a physiological frailty index (FI-Lab) for this cohort. The study sample comprised responders aged 40 years or older who completed a health monitoring visit at Mount Sinai Center within the past 5 years. For each subject, FI-Lab was computed as the proportion of 20 physiological parameters (lab tests, pulmonary function, and blood pressure) on which the subject had abnormal values. Using negative binomial regression models, we tested FI-Lab's association with the SF-12 wellbeing score and various demographic characteristics. FI-Lab showed strong associations with the physical and mental components of the SF-12 as well as age, race, and smoking status. Using a cutoff of 0.25 to define presence of physiological/preclinical frailty, we found frailty prevalence in the study sample to be approximately 12%. This study demonstrates the feasibility of assessing preclinical frailty in the WTC responder cohort.

Citing Articles

Comparing frailty prevalence between countries: validation of the Global Burden of Disease study Frailty Index (GBD-FI) in the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe.

ODonovan M, Devleesschauwer B, Sezgin D, Liew A, Kabir Z, OCaoimh R Age Ageing. 2023; 52(11).

PMID: 38029517 PMC: 11004790. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad214.


The frailty index based on laboratory test data as a tool to investigate the impact of frailty on health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sapp D, Cormier B, Rockwood K, Howlett S, Heinze S Age Ageing. 2023; 52(1).

PMID: 36626319 PMC: 9831271. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac309.


Impact of preoperative laboratory frailty index on mortality and clinical outcomes in older surgical patients with cancer.

Kim Y, Song K, Kang C, Lee H Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):9200.

PMID: 35654943 PMC: 9163125. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13426-4.


Frailty indices based on self-report, blood-based biomarkers and examination-based data in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.

Blodgett J, Perez-Zepeda M, Godin J, Kehler D, Andrew M, Kirkland S Age Ageing. 2022; 51(5).

PMID: 35524747 PMC: 9078045. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac075.


Cognitive impairment and World Trade Centre-related exposures.

Clouston S, Hall C, Kritikos M, Bennett D, DeKosky S, Edwards J Nat Rev Neurol. 2021; 18(2):103-116.

PMID: 34795448 PMC: 8938977. DOI: 10.1038/s41582-021-00576-8.


References
1.
Blodgett J, Theou O, Howlett S, Rockwood K . A frailty index from common clinical and laboratory tests predicts increased risk of death across the life course. Geroscience. 2017; 39(4):447-455. PMC: 5636769. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-017-9993-7. View

2.
Ritt M, Jager J, Ritt J, Sieber C, Gassmann K . Operationalizing a frailty index using routine blood and urine tests. Clin Interv Aging. 2017; 12:1029-1040. PMC: 5500540. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S131987. View

3.
Cohen A, Li Q, Milot E, Leroux M, Faucher S, Morissette-Thomas V . Statistical distance as a measure of physiological dysregulation is largely robust to variation in its biomarker composition. PLoS One. 2015; 10(4):e0122541. PMC: 4395377. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122541. View

4.
Theou O, Brothers T, Pena F, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K . Identifying common characteristics of frailty across seven scales. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014; 62(5):901-6. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.12773. View

5.
Morley J, Vellas B, Abellan van Kan G, Anker S, Bauer J, Bernabei R . Frailty consensus: a call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013; 14(6):392-7. PMC: 4084863. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.03.022. View