» Articles » PMID: 2968185

Effects of Anesthetic Induction on Myocardial Function and Metabolism: a Comparison of Fentanyl, Sufentanil and Alfentanil

Overview
Journal Can J Anaesth
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 1988 May 1
PMID 2968185
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Anaesthetic induction may induce myocardial ischaemia. A prospective randomized trial was instituted to compare the effect on ventricular function and myocardial metabolism of induction with fentanyl (FEN) or its analogues sufentanil (SUF) or alfentanil (ALF) in 96 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Haemodynamic, metabolic (coronary sinus oxygen and lactate extraction) and gated ventriculographic measurements were made awake pre-induction (PRE), after induction (IND) and after intubation (INT). Induction was performed with FEN 75 micrograms.kg-1, SUF 15 micrograms.kg-1 or ALF 125 micrograms.kg-1 and metocurine. Fentanyl induction was associated with the greatest stability of mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac performance, and systolic function without associated myocardial lactate production. SUF produced the greatest depression of systolic function (p less than 0.05) but without haemodynamic instability or myocardial lactate production in all but one patient. Induction with ALF produced the greatest reduction in MAP (p less than 0.05) associated with the greatest decrease in diastolic compliance (p less than 0.05) and 50 per cent incidence of myocardial lactate production (p less than 0.05) with no significant change in coronary blood flow or myocardial oxygen consumption.

Citing Articles

Machine learning-based prediction of post-induction hypotension: identifying risk factors and enhancing anesthesia management.

Chen M, Zhang D BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025; 25(1):96.

PMID: 39987101 PMC: 11846375. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-025-02930-y.


Remifentanil improves left ventricular diastolic parameters in patients with impaired diastolic function: a prospective clinical study.

Koner O, Simsek M, Kizilcik N, Koca C, Cabbar A BMC Anesthesiol. 2024; 24(1):45.

PMID: 38302904 PMC: 10832159. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02425-9.


Comparison of Two Clinical Protocols for Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) for Breast Surgery Using Propofol Combined With Either Sufentanil or Alfentanil.

Radke O, Sippel D, Radke K, Hilgers R, Saur P Anesth Pain Med. 2014; 4(4):e19278.

PMID: 25337474 PMC: 4199218. DOI: 10.5812/aapm.19278.


Is general anesthesia a risk for myocardium? Effect of anesthesia on myocardial function as assessed by cardiac troponin-i in two different groups (isofluran+N2O inhalation and propofol+fentanyl iv anesthesia).

Erol D, Ozen I Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007; 3(5):755-8.

PMID: 18078027 PMC: 2291320.


Comparison of sevoflurane/fentanyl and isoflurane/fentanyl during elective coronary artery bypass surgery. Sevoflurane Venture Group.

Searle N, Martineau R, Conzen P, Mark L, Ebert T, Muzi M Can J Anaesth. 1996; 43(9):890-9.

PMID: 8874905 DOI: 10.1007/BF03011801.


References
1.
Bower S, Hull C . Comparative pharmacokinetics of fentanyl and alfentanil. Br J Anaesth. 1982; 54(8):871-7. DOI: 10.1093/bja/54.8.871. View

2.
Grossman W, Braunwald E, Mann T, McLaurin L, GREEN L . Contractile state of the left ventricle in man as evaluated from end-systolic pressure-volume relations. Circulation. 1977; 56(5):845-52. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.56.5.845. View

3.
Sethna D, MOFFITT E . An appreciation of the coronary circulation. Anesth Analg. 1986; 65(3):294-305. View

4.
Ellis A, Klocke F . Effects of preload on the transmural distribution of perfusion and pressure-flow relationships in the canine coronary vascular bed. Circ Res. 1980; 46(1):68-77. DOI: 10.1161/01.res.46.1.68. View

5.
Weisel R, Burns R, Baird R, Hilton J, Ivanov J, Mickle D . A comparison of volume loading and atrial pacing following aortocoronary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1983; 36(3):332-44. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)60138-5. View