» Articles » PMID: 29680465

Treatment Strategies and Cumulative Live Birth Rates in WHO-II Ovulation Disorders

Abstract

Objective: To assess the live birth rate in women with WHO II anovulation and the proportion of women that need second or third line treatments if the initial therapy fails.

Study Design: In this multicenter cohort study we included couples with unfulfilled child wish who were referred to three fertility clinics in the Netherlands and selected women with a WHO II ovulation disorder as the only final infertility diagnosis (n = 468).

Results: The cumulative live birth rate of the total group was 82% (383/468). The majority started with clomiphene-citrate as first-line treatment (n = 378) resulting in 180 (48%) live births. There were 153 couples (40%) who underwent a second-line treatment (recombinant-FSH or laparoscopic electrocoagulation of the ovaries, LEO) and 52 couples (14%) a third-line treatment (IVF/ICSI), resulting in 44% and 63% treatment dependent live births rates, respectively. Of all couples, 92 (20%) conceived naturally, 186 (40%) after clomiphene-citrate, 60 (13%) after recombinant-FSH, nine (2%) after LEO and 36 (8%) after IVF.

Conclusion: Subfertile women with a WHO II ovulation disorder have a good prognosis on live birth, and most did so after ovulation induction with clomiphene-citrate. If first-line ovulation induction has failed ovulation induction with gonadotrophins or IVF still result in a live birth in about half of the cases.

Citing Articles

Biosimilars versus the originator of follitropin alfa for ovarian stimulation in ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kiose K, Storr A, Kolibianakis E, Mol B, Venetis C Hum Reprod. 2024; 40(2):343-359.

PMID: 39719046 PMC: 11788201. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae274.


Strong social disparities in access to IVF/ICSI despite free cost of treatment: a French population-based nationwide cohort study.

Ben Messaoud K, Guibert J, Bouyer J, de La Rochebrochard E BMC Womens Health. 2023; 23(1):621.

PMID: 37993813 PMC: 10664362. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02784-4.


Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Originator Follitropin Alfa and Follitropin Alfa Biosimilars in Real-world Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Study.

Patel N, Patel N, Patel M, Bhadarka H, Vyas K J Hum Reprod Sci. 2023; 16(2):148-155.

PMID: 37547084 PMC: 10404022. DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_37_23.


Comparative Assessment of the Structural Features of Originator Recombinant Human Follitropin Alfa Versus Recombinant Human Follitropin Alfa Biosimilar Preparations Approved in Non-European Regions.

Manzi L, Sepe N, Migliaccio W, Lanzoni L, Iozzino L, DAngelo F Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(12).

PMID: 35743204 PMC: 9223809. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23126762.


Comparative effectiveness of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alfa (r-hFSH-alfa) versus highly purified urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG HP) in assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments: a non-interventional study in....

Buhler K, Fischer R, Verpillat P, Allignol A, Guedes S, Boutmy E Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021; 19(1):90.

PMID: 34134695 PMC: 8207759. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-021-00768-3.