» Articles » PMID: 29677051

Electrocardiographic Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation in Nonhypertensive and Hypertensive Individuals

Overview
Journal J Hypertens
Date 2018 Apr 21
PMID 29677051
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the predictive value of ECG abnormalities for atrial fibrillation in nonhypertensive versus hypertensive individuals.

Methods: We recorded ECG and measured conventional cardiovascular risk factors in a nationwide population-based sample of 5813 Finns. We divided the participants into nonhypertensive (n = 3148) and hypertensive (n = 2665) individuals and followed the participants for incident atrial fibrillation events. We evaluated the predictive ability of 12 ECG abnormalities for atrial fibrillation using multivariable-adjusted Fine-Gray models.

Results: During a follow-up of 11.9 ± 2.9 years, 111 nonhypertensive and 301 hypertensive participants developed atrial fibrillation. Negative T wave in lateral leads predicted atrial fibrillation in both nonhypertensive [hazard ratio (HR), 4.59; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.84-11.44] and hypertensive participants (HR, 1.81; 95% CI 1.16-2.84). In nonhypertensive participants, 1-SD increments in corrected QT interval (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.18-1.71) and T-wave amplitude in lead augmented vector R (aVR) (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.10-1.80) were related to atrial fibrillation. In hypertensive participants, prolonged PR interval (HR, 1.59; 95% CI 1.05-2.41), prolonged P-wave duration (HR, 1.43; 95% CI 1.07-1.91), left ventricular hypertrophy by Sokolow-Lyon criteria (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.12-2.14) and poor R-wave progression (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.02-2.48) predicted atrial fibrillation. Corrected QT interval and T-wave amplitude in lead aVR were stronger predictors of atrial fibrillation in nonhypertensive than in hypertensive participants. ECG abnormalities improved risk prediction only marginally (delta area under receiver-operating-characteristic curve = 0.000-0.005).

Conclusion: Several ECG abnormalities associate with incident atrial fibrillation in hypertensive and nonhypertensive individuals but provide only marginal incremental predictive value. Corrected QT interval and T-wave amplitude in lead aVR may relate stronger to incident atrial fibrillation in nonhypertensive than in hypertensive individuals.

Citing Articles

Exploring the impact of electrocardiographic parameters on the risk of common arrhythmias: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

Wu G, Zhang Q, Zhang J, Zhu J, Zheng D, Wang Y J Thorac Dis. 2024; 16(7):4553-4566.

PMID: 39144314 PMC: 11320266. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-24-814.


Predicting risk of AF in ischaemic stroke using sinus rhythm ECG abnormalities: A meta-analysis.

Berry-Noronha A, Bonavia L, Wilson D, Eranti A, Rasmussen M, Sajadieh A Eur Stroke J. 2023; 8(3):712-721.

PMID: 37641552 PMC: 10472966. DOI: 10.1177/23969873231172559.


Electrocardiographic Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation.

Chousou P, Chattopadhyay R, Tsampasian V, Vassiliou V, Pugh P Med Sci (Basel). 2023; 11(2).

PMID: 37092499 PMC: 10123668. DOI: 10.3390/medsci11020030.


Association of CHA2DS2-VASc Score with Long-Term Incidence of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Stroke after Myocardial Infarction.

Jaakkola S, Paana T, Airaksinen J, Sipila J, Kyto V J Clin Med. 2022; 11(23).

PMID: 36498665 PMC: 9739941. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11237090.


Prognostic significance of first-degree atrioventricular block in a large Asian population: a prospective cohort study.

Liu M, Du Z, Sun Y BMJ Open. 2022; 12(4):e062005.

PMID: 35379649 PMC: 8981319. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062005.