» Articles » PMID: 29675714

Normal Temporal Binding Window but No Sound-induced Flash Illusion in People with One Eye

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2018 Apr 21
PMID 29675714
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Integrating vision and hearing is an important way in which we process our rich sensory environment. Partial deprivation of the visual system from the loss of one eye early in life results in adaptive changes in the remaining senses (e.g., Hoover et al. in Exp Brain Res 216:565-74, 2012). The current study investigates whether losing one eye early in life impacts the temporal window in which audiovisual events are integrated and whether there is vulnerability to the sound-induced flash illusion. In Experiment 1, we measured the temporal binding window with a simultaneity judgement task where low-level auditory and visual stimuli were presented at different stimulus onset asynchronies. People with one eye did not differ in the width of their temporal binding window, but they took longer to make judgements compared to binocular viewing controls. In Experiment 2, we measured how many light flashes were perceived when a single flash was paired with multiple auditory beeps in close succession (sound induced flash illusion). Unlike controls, who perceived multiple light flashes with two, three or four beeps, people with one eye were not susceptible to the sound-induced flash illusion. In addition, they took no longer to respond compared to both binocular and monocular (eye-patched) viewing controls. Taken together, these results suggest that the lack of susceptibility to the sound-induced flash illusion in people with one eye cannot be accounted for by the width of the temporal binding window. These results provide evidence for adaptations in audiovisual integration due to the reduction of visual input from the loss of one eye early in life.

Citing Articles

Tactile cues are more intrinsically linked to motor timing than visual cues in visual-tactile sensorimotor synchronization.

Huntley M, Nguyen A, Albrecht M, Marinovic W Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 86(3):1022-1037.

PMID: 38263510 PMC: 11062975. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02828-9.


Perception of the McGurk effect in people with one eye depends on whether the eye is removed during infancy or adulthood.

Moro S, Qureshi F, Steeves J Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1217831.

PMID: 37901426 PMC: 10603249. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1217831.


Sound-induced flash illusions at different spatial locations were affected by personality traits.

Zhou H, Li S, Huang J, Yang J, Wang A, Zhang M Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022; 85(2):463-473.

PMID: 36539573 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02638-5.


Brain Activation for Audiovisual Information in People With One Eye Compared to Binocular and Eye-Patched Viewing Controls.

Moro S, Gorbet D, Steeves J Front Neurosci. 2020; 14:529.

PMID: 32508588 PMC: 7253581. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00529.

References
1.
Stevenson R, Zemtsov R, Wallace M . Individual differences in the multisensory temporal binding window predict susceptibility to audiovisual illusions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012; 38(6):1517-29. PMC: 3795069. DOI: 10.1037/a0027339. View

2.
Green K, Kuhl P . Integral processing of visual place and auditory voicing information during phonetic perception. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991; 17(1):278-88. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.17.1.278. View

3.
Wong N, Rafique S, Kelly K, Moro S, Gallie B, Steeves J . Altered white matter structure in the visual system following early monocular enucleation. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017; 39(1):133-144. PMC: 6866261. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23831. View

4.
Elbert T, Sterr A, Rockstroh B, Pantev C, Muller M, Taub E . Expansion of the tonotopic area in the auditory cortex of the blind. J Neurosci. 2002; 22(22):9941-4. PMC: 6757838. View

5.
Powers 3rd A, Hevey M, Wallace M . Neural correlates of multisensory perceptual learning. J Neurosci. 2012; 32(18):6263-74. PMC: 3366559. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6138-11.2012. View