» Articles » PMID: 29669579

Long-term Prognostic Implications of Risk Factors Associated with Tumor Size: a Case Study of Women Regularly Attending Screening

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Apr 20
PMID 29669579
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Breast cancer prognosis is strongly associated with tumor size at diagnosis. We aimed to identify factors associated with diagnosis of large (> 2 cm) compared to small tumors, and to examine implications for long-term prognosis.

Methods: We examined 2012 women with invasive breast cancer, of whom 1466 had screen-detected and 546 interval cancers that were incident between 2001 and 2008 in a population-based screening cohort, and followed them to 31 December 2015. Body mass index (BMI) was ascertained after diagnosis at the time of study enrollment during 2009. PD was measured based on the contralateral mammogram within 3 years before diagnosis. We used multiple logistic regression modeling to examine the association between tumor size and body mass index (BMI), mammographic percent density (PD), or hormonal and genetic risk factors. Associations between the identified risk factors and, in turn, the outcomes of local recurrence, distant metastases, and death (153 events in total) in women with breast cancer were examined using Cox regression. Analyses were carried out according to mode of detection.

Results: BMI and PD were the only factors associated with tumor size at diagnosis. For BMI (≥25 vs. < 25 kg/m), the multiple adjusted odds ratios (OR) were 1.37 (95% CI 1.02-1.83) and 2.12 (95% CI 1.41-3.18), for screen-detected and interval cancers, respectively. For PD (≥20 vs. < 20%), the corresponding ORs were 1.72 (95% CI 1.29-2.30) and 0.60 (95% CI 0.40-0.90). Among women with interval cancers, those with high BMI had worse prognosis than women with low BMI (hazard ratio 1.70; 95% CI 1.04-2.77), but PD was not associated with the hazard rate. Among screen-detected cancers, neither BMI nor PD was associated with the hazard rate.

Conclusions: In conclusion, high BMI was associated with the risk of having a tumor larger than 2 cm at diagnosis. Among women with interval cancer, high BMI was associated with worse prognosis. We believe that women with high BMI should be especially encouraged to attend screening.

Citing Articles

Mammographic features differ with body composition in women with breast cancer.

Sartor H, Sturesdotter L, Larsson A, Rosendahl A, Zackrisson S Eur Radiol. 2024; 35(1):151-159.

PMID: 38992111 PMC: 11632076. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10937-8.


AI-based selection of individuals for supplemental MRI in population-based breast cancer screening: the randomized ScreenTrustMRI trial.

Salim M, Liu Y, Sorkhei M, Ntoula D, Foukakis T, Fredriksson I Nat Med. 2024; 30(9):2623-2630.

PMID: 38977914 PMC: 11405258. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03093-5.


Evaluation of Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated IVS10 Mutation in Breast Cancer Along with Clinicopathological Parameters.

Ahuja S, Aneja H, Yadav A, Ranga S, Chintamani , Paul J J Midlife Health. 2024; 14(4):272-279.

PMID: 38504739 PMC: 10946688. DOI: 10.4103/jmh.jmh_71_23.


Postdiagnosis body fatness, weight change and breast cancer prognosis: Global Cancer Update Program (CUP global) systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Chan D, Vieira R, Abar L, Aune D, Balducci K, Cariolou M Int J Cancer. 2022; 152(4):572-599.

PMID: 36279884 PMC: 10092239. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34322.


Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast: a study of five cases.

Liu L, Lin X, Xiang H, Tang G, Li C J Radiol Case Rep. 2021; 14(11):16-25.

PMID: 33708341 PMC: 7942960. DOI: 10.3941/jrcr.v14i11.3921.


References
1.
Tornberg S, Kemetli L, Ascunce N, Hofvind S, Anttila A, Seradour B . A pooled analysis of interval cancer rates in six European countries. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2009; 19(2):87-93. DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32833548ed. View

2.
Ewertz M, Jensen M, Gunnarsdottir K, Hojris I, Jakobsen E, Nielsen D . Effect of obesity on prognosis after early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 29(1):25-31. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.7614. View

3.
Camoriano J, Loprinzi C, Ingle J, Therneau T, Krook J, Veeder M . Weight change in women treated with adjuvant therapy or observed following mastectomy for node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1990; 8(8):1327-34. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.8.1327. View

4.
Olsson A, Garne J, Tengrup I, Zackrisson S, Manjer J . Body mass index and breast cancer survival in relation to the introduction of mammographic screening. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009; 35(12):1261-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.04.012. View

5.
Holm J, Humphreys K, Li J, Ploner A, Cheddad A, Eriksson M . Risk factors and tumor characteristics of interval cancers by mammographic density. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33(9):1030-7. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.9986. View