» Articles » PMID: 29669102

Trends in the Prevalence and Disparity in Cognitive Limitations of Americans 55-69 Years Old

Overview
Date 2018 Apr 19
PMID 29669102
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether the prevalence of cognitive limitation (CL) among Americans ages 55 to 69 years changed between 1998 and 2014, and to assess the trends in socioeconomic disparities in CL among groups defined by race/ethnicity, education, income, and wealth.

Method: Logistic regression using 1998-2014 data from the biennial Health and Retirement Study, a nationally representative data set. CL is defined as a score of 0-11 on a 27-point cognitive battery of items focused on memory. Socioeconomic status (SES) measures are classified as quartiles.

Results: In models controlling for age, gender, and previous cognitive testing, we find no significant change over time in the overall prevalence of CL, widening disparities in limitation by income and, in some cases, wealth, and improvements among non-Hispanic whites but not other racial/ethnic groups.

Discussion: Among people 55-69, rates of CL are many times higher for groups with lower SES than those with higher SES, and recent trends show little indication that the gaps are narrowing.

Citing Articles

Associations between discriminatory experiences and dementia in the Health and Retirement Study.

Tyan J, Thorpe Jr R, Ladd-Acosta C, Dickerson A Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39920237 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-025-02822-6.


Cognitive performance trends among European older adults: exploring variations across cohorts, gender, and educational levels (2007-2017).

Rehnberg J, Fors S, Ford K, Leist A BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1646.

PMID: 38902637 PMC: 11188163. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19123-3.


2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.

Alzheimers Dement. 2024; 20(5):3708-3821.

PMID: 38689398 PMC: 11095490. DOI: 10.1002/alz.13809.


A national longitudinal dyadic analysis of spousal education and cognitive decline in the United States.

Liu H, Chopik W, Shrout M, Wang J Soc Sci Med. 2024; 343:116603.

PMID: 38281387 PMC: 10923139. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116603.


Measuring spatial availability of children for older adults with disability.

Cho T, Park B, Choi H Soc Sci Med. 2023; 335:116201.

PMID: 37729819 PMC: 10980977. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116201.


References
1.
Dowd J, Hamoudi A . Is life expectancy really falling for groups of low socio-economic status? Lagged selection bias and artefactual trends in mortality. Int J Epidemiol. 2014; 43(4):983-8. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyu120. View

2.
Schoeni R, Martin L, Andreski P, Freedman V . Persistent and growing socioeconomic disparities in disability among the elderly: 1982-2002. Am J Public Health. 2005; 95(11):2065-70. PMC: 1449484. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.048744. View

3.
Stern Y . Cognitive reserve in ageing and Alzheimer's disease. Lancet Neurol. 2012; 11(11):1006-12. PMC: 3507991. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70191-6. View

4.
Fitzpatrick A, Kuller L, Ives D, Lopez O, Jagust W, Breitner J . Incidence and prevalence of dementia in the Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004; 52(2):195-204. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52058.x. View

5.
Choi H, Schoeni R, Martin L . Are Functional and Activity Limitations Becoming More Prevalent among 55 to 69-Year-Olds in the United States?. PLoS One. 2016; 11(10):e0164565. PMC: 5082687. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164565. View