» Articles » PMID: 29667065

Single-Site Laparoscopy and Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Urology

Overview
Journal Curr Urol Rep
Publisher Current Science
Specialty Urology
Date 2018 Apr 19
PMID 29667065
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Of Review: In this review, we summarize research that has evaluated the role of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) and robotic surgery in pediatric urology, highlighting new and/or controversial ideas.

Recent Findings: The newest research developments over the last several years are studies that address generalizability of these techniques, ideal patient factors, extrapolation to more complex surgeries, and comparative studies to more traditional techniques to define the associated costs and benefits, as well as patient-centered outcomes. Specifically in the field of LESS, addressing the limitations of suboptimal vision, instrument crowding, and loss of triangulation have been a focus. The literature is now replete with new applications for robotic surgery as well as descriptions of the specific technical challenges inherent to pediatrics. Robotic surgery and LESS are areas of growth in pediatric urology that allow continual innovation and expansion of technology within a surgeon's armamentarium.

Citing Articles

Robot-assisted pyeloplasty and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: A comparison of single-port-plus-one and multiport surgery.

Chen J, Xu H, Lin S, He S, Tang K, Xiao Z Front Pediatr. 2022; 10:957790.

PMID: 36340736 PMC: 9634126. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.957790.


Advances and Trends in Pediatric Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Meinzer A, Alkatout I, Krebs T, Baastrup J, Reischig K, Meiksans R J Clin Med. 2020; 9(12).

PMID: 33321836 PMC: 7764454. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9123999.


Applications of Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Surgery of the Pediatric Urinary Tract.

Szavay P Front Pediatr. 2019; 7:29.

PMID: 30805327 PMC: 6378287. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2019.00029.

References
1.
Arlen A, Broderick K, Travers C, Smith E, Elmore J, Kirsch A . Outcomes of complex robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation in the pediatric population. J Pediatr Urol. 2016; 12(3):169.e1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.11.007. View

2.
Grimsby G, Keays M, Villanueva C, Bush N, Snodgrass W, Gargollo P . Non-absorbable sutures are associated with lower recurrence rates in laparoscopic percutaneous inguinal hernia ligation. J Pediatr Urol. 2015; 11(5):275.e1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.04.029. View

3.
Patel N, Santomauro M, Marietti S, Chiang G . Laparoendoscopic single site surgery in pediatric urology: does it require specialized tools?. Int Braz J Urol. 2016; 42(2):277-83. PMC: 4871388. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0444. View

4.
Biles M, Finkelstein J, Silva M, Lambert S, Casale P . Innovation in Robotics and Pediatric Urology: Robotic Ureteroureterostomy for Duplex Systems with Ureteral Ectopia. J Endourol. 2016; 30(10):1041-1048. DOI: 10.1089/end.2015.0645. View

5.
Storm D, Fulmer B, Sumfest J . Robotic-assisted laparoscopic approach for posterior bladder neck dissection and placement of pediatric bladder neck sling: initial experience. Urology. 2008; 72(5):1149-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.07.005. View