» Articles » PMID: 29666255

Digitizing Omics Profiles by Divergence from a Baseline

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2018 Apr 19
PMID 29666255
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Data collected from omics technologies have revealed pervasive heterogeneity and stochasticity of molecular states within and between phenotypes. A prominent example of such heterogeneity occurs between genome-wide mRNA, microRNA, and methylation profiles from one individual tumor to another, even within a cancer subtype. However, current methods in bioinformatics, such as detecting differentially expressed genes or CpG sites, are population-based and therefore do not effectively model intersample diversity. Here we introduce a unified theory to quantify sample-level heterogeneity that is applicable to a single omics profile. Specifically, we simplify an omics profile to a digital representation based on the omics profiles from a set of samples from a reference or baseline population (e.g., normal tissues). The state of any subprofile (e.g., expression vector for a subset of genes) is said to be "divergent" if it lies outside the estimated support of the baseline distribution and is consequently interpreted as "dysregulated" relative to that baseline. We focus on two cases: single features (e.g., individual genes) and distinguished subsets (e.g., regulatory pathways). Notably, since the divergence analysis is at the individual sample level, dysregulation can be analyzed probabilistically; for example, one can estimate the probability that a gene or pathway is divergent in some population. Finally, the reduction in complexity facilitates a more "personalized" and biologically interpretable analysis of variation, as illustrated by experiments involving tissue characterization, disease detection and progression, and disease-pathway associations.

Citing Articles

PhosCancer: A comprehensive database for investigating protein phosphorylation in human cancer.

Dong Q, Shen D, Ye J, Chen J, Li J iScience. 2024; 27(11):111060.

PMID: 39493875 PMC: 11530918. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111060.


CellBiAge: Improved single-cell age classification using data binarization.

Yu D, Li M, Linghu G, Hu Y, Hajdarovic K, Wang A Cell Rep. 2023; 42(12):113500.

PMID: 38032797 PMC: 10791072. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113500.


Transcriptomic Harmonization as the Way for Suppressing Cross-Platform Bias and Batch Effect.

Borisov N, Buzdin A Biomedicines. 2022; 10(9).

PMID: 36140419 PMC: 9496268. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10092318.


Comprehensive Analysis of Ubiquitously Expressed Genes in Humans from A Data-driven Perspective.

Gu J, Dai J, Lu H, Zhao H Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2022; 21(1):164-176.

PMID: 35569803 PMC: 10373092. DOI: 10.1016/j.gpb.2021.08.017.


Efficient representations of tumor diversity with paired DNA-RNA aberrations.

Ke Q, Dinalankara W, Younes L, Geman D, Marchionni L PLoS Comput Biol. 2021; 17(6):e1008944.

PMID: 34115745 PMC: 8221796. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008944.


References
1.
Tan A, Naiman D, Xu L, Winslow R, Geman D . Simple decision rules for classifying human cancers from gene expression profiles. Bioinformatics. 2005; 21(20):3896-904. PMC: 1987374. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti631. View

2.
Saade G, Boggess K, Sullivan S, Markenson G, Iams J, Coonrod D . Development and validation of a spontaneous preterm delivery predictor in asymptomatic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214(5):633.e1-633.e24. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.001. View

3.
Ross A, Johnson M, Yousefi K, Davicioni E, Netto G, Marchionni L . Tissue-based Genomics Augments Post-prostatectomy Risk Stratification in a Natural History Cohort of Intermediate- and High-Risk Men. Eur Urol. 2015; 69(1):157-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.042. View

4.
Liberzon A, Birger C, Thorvaldsdottir H, Ghandi M, Mesirov J, Tamayo P . The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 2016; 1(6):417-425. PMC: 4707969. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.004. View

5.
Bolstad B, Irizarry R, Astrand M, Speed T . A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19(2):185-93. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.185. View