New Technologies and Techniques for Prostate Cancer Focal Therapy
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Introduction: The aim of this study was to review the oncological and functional outcomes of new and established primary focal treatments (FT) for localized prostate cancer (PCa).
Evidence Acquisition: We performed a systematic search of published studies on FT for localized PCa using electronic databases (Medline and Embase). These studies included reports on hemi-ablation, focal ablation and target-ablation. We excluded salvage focal therapy studies and limited the search to those with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up.
Evidence Synthesis: We selected 20 studies with a total of 2523 patients who were treated in the primary setting. The energy sources used were cryotherapy (8), high-intensity focused ultrasound (9), irreversible electroporation (1), photodynamic therapy (1) and focused laser ablation (1), with 65% hemiablation, 25% focal ablation and 10% target-ablation. The median follow-ups ranged from 6 to 44.4 months. Mean age was 60.4-70 years and mean prostate-specific antigen was 4.4-<10 ng/dL; 26-100% had a Gleason Score of 6, and 0-65% had a Gleason Score of 7. Patient selection was carried out by TRUS biopsy in 9 studies, while transperineal template mapping biopsy and mp-MRI were employed in six and 13 studies, respectively. The overall post-treatment positive biopsy rate was 1.2-51% with 1.6-32% patients having a residual disease in the treated area. The post-treatment continence rates were 90-100%, and the rates of erectile dysfunction ranged from 0-53.2%.
Conclusions: Reliable evidence for the partial-gland treatment of PCa is increasing, and encouraging mid-term oncologic outcomes with the preservation of sexual and urinary functions have been reported. Accurate patient selection at the outset of treatment and careful follow-up seem key attributes to achieve excellent functional results and encouraging oncological outcomes.
Trends in focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a bibliometric analysis from 2014 to 2023.
Xia Z, Zhang S, Sun J, Wang S, Xia Q Discov Oncol. 2024; 15(1):472.
PMID: 39331332 PMC: 11436610. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-01387-1.
Andrade G, Manente F, Barroso P, Teles S, Partezani A, Baccaglini W Int Braz J Urol. 2024; 50.
PMID: 38446906 PMC: 11152337. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0628.
Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) for Prostate Cancer (PCa) Treatment: The State of the Art.
Faiella E, Santucci D, Vertulli D, Vergantino E, Vaccarino F, Perillo G J Pers Med. 2024; 14(2).
PMID: 38392571 PMC: 10890194. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14020137.
Navigating the screening and treatment of prostate cancer.
Kokorovic A Can Urol Assoc J. 2023; 17(4):92-93.
PMID: 37011300 PMC: 10073524. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.8340.
Treatment of localized prostate cancer in elderly patients: the role of partial cryoablation.
Selvaggio O, Finati M, Falagario U, Silecchia G, Recchia M, Checchia A Int Urol Nephrol. 2023; 55(5):1125-1132.
PMID: 36809642 PMC: 10105669. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03519-y.