» Articles » PMID: 29662254

Cooperative Decision-Making and Intimate Partner Violence in Peru

Overview
Journal Popul Dev Rev
Date 2018 Apr 18
PMID 29662254
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Using the continuous Demographic and Health Surveys (2005-2012) for Peru, we employ multinomial logistic regression estimates to assess risk for intimate partner violence (IPV). Using empowerment and gender frameworks for IPV, we find that women making more household decisions jointly are less likely to experience physical violence. We also find that education is negatively associated with IPV, unless a woman's attainment exceeds her partner's. Although women earning more than their partners are more likely to experience violence, joint decision-makers have a lower risk of moderate physical violence even when their status exceeds that of a male partner. By adding measures for relationship dynamics, we highlight the ways decision-making within the household contributes to violence risk for women. While deviating from male-breadwinning norms can result in violence, risk factors are conditioned on the nature of cooperation within a partnership. Our findings suggest that shared power within the household reduces IPV risk.

Citing Articles

Prognostic factors of first intimate partner violence among ever-married women in Sub-Saharan Africa: Gompertz gamma shared frailty modeling.

Seifu B, Asebe H, Legesse B, Mulaw G, Tebeje T, Mare K PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0303187.

PMID: 38820457 PMC: 11142580. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303187.


How does empowering men affect intimate partner violence? Evidence from Bangladesh.

Francis-Tan A SSM Popul Health. 2024; 26:101656.

PMID: 38544696 PMC: 10965466. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101656.


Hybrid Interpersonal Violence in Latin America: Patterns and Causes.

Weitzman A, Caudillo M, Levy E Annu Rev Criminol. 2024; 7:163-186.

PMID: 38304058 PMC: 10830161. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-criminol-022422-014603.


Factors and consequences associated with intimate partner violence against women in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.

Gunarathne L, Bhowmik J, Apputhurai P, Nedeljkovic M PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0293295.

PMID: 37939106 PMC: 10631698. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293295.


Exploring the association between attitudes towards wife beating and intimate partner violence using a dyadic approach in three sub-Saharan African countries.

Bengesai A, Khan H BMJ Open. 2023; 13(6):e062977.

PMID: 37316321 PMC: 10277069. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062977.


References
1.
Glass N, Laughon K, Campbell J, Block C, Hanson G, Sharps P . Non-fatal strangulation is an important risk factor for homicide of women. J Emerg Med. 2007; 35(3):329-35. PMC: 2573025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.02.065. View

2.
Dalal K, Lindqvist K . A national study of the prevalence and correlates of domestic violence among women in India. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2010; 24(2):265-77. DOI: 10.1177/1010539510384499. View

3.
Wiebe D . Homicide and suicide risks associated with firearms in the home: a national case-control study. Ann Emerg Med. 2003; 41(6):771-82. DOI: 10.1067/mem.2003.187. View

4.
Mogford E . When status hurts: dimensions of women's status and domestic abuse in rural Northern India. Violence Against Women. 2011; 17(7):835-57. DOI: 10.1177/1077801211412545. View

5.
Rocca C, Rathod S, Falle T, Pande R, Krishnan S . Challenging assumptions about women's empowerment: social and economic resources and domestic violence among young married women in urban South India. Int J Epidemiol. 2008; 38(2):577-85. PMC: 2734072. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyn226. View