» Articles » PMID: 29659930

Automated Cervical Screening and Triage, Based on HPV Testing and Computer-Interpreted Cytology

Abstract

Background: State-of-the-art cervical cancer prevention includes human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among adolescents and screening/treatment of cervical precancer (CIN3/AIS and, less strictly, CIN2) among adults. HPV testing provides sensitive detection of precancer but, to reduce overtreatment, secondary "triage" is needed to predict women at highest risk. Those with the highest-risk HPV types or abnormal cytology are commonly referred to colposcopy; however, expert cytology services are critically lacking in many regions.

Methods: To permit completely automatable cervical screening/triage, we designed and validated a novel triage method, a cytologic risk score algorithm based on computer-scanned liquid-based slide features (FocalPoint, BD, Burlington, NC). We compared it with abnormal cytology in predicting precancer among 1839 women testing HPV positive (HC2, Qiagen, Germantown, MD) in 2010 at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC). Precancer outcomes were ascertained by record linkage. As additional validation, we compared the algorithm prospectively with cytology results among 243 807 women screened at KPNC (2016-2017). All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: Among HPV-positive women, the algorithm matched the triage performance of abnormal cytology. Combined with HPV16/18/45 typing (Onclarity, BD, Sparks, MD), the automatable strategy referred 91.7% of HPV-positive CIN3/AIS cases to immediate colposcopy while deferring 38.4% of all HPV-positive women to one-year retesting (compared with 89.1% and 37.4%, respectively, for typing and cytology triage). In the 2016-2017 validation, the predicted risk scores strongly correlated with cytology (P < .001).

Conclusions: High-quality cervical screening and triage performance is achievable using this completely automated approach. Automated technology could permit extension of high-quality cervical screening/triage coverage to currently underserved regions.

Citing Articles

Performance of a Full-Coverage Cervical Cancer Screening Program Using on an Artificial Intelligence- and Cloud-Based Diagnostic System: Observational Study of an Ultralarge Population.

Ji L, Yao Y, Yu D, Chen W, Yin S, Fu Y J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26():e51477.

PMID: 39566061 PMC: 11618014. DOI: 10.2196/51477.


Strategies to eliminate cervical cancer in China.

Ji L, Chen M, Yao L Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1105468.

PMID: 37333817 PMC: 10273099. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1105468.


Artificial Intelligence in Cervical Cancer Screening and Diagnosis.

Hou X, Shen G, Zhou L, Li Y, Wang T, Ma X Front Oncol. 2022; 12:851367.

PMID: 35359358 PMC: 8963491. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.851367.


How Can a High-Performance Screening Strategy Be Determined for Cervical Cancer Prevention? Evidence From a Hierarchical Clustering Analysis of a Multicentric Clinical Study.

Bao H, Zhang X, Bi H, Zhao Y, Fang L, Wang H Front Oncol. 2022; 12:816789.

PMID: 35155253 PMC: 8829547. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.816789.


The development of "automated visual evaluation" for cervical cancer screening: The promise and challenges in adapting deep-learning for clinical testing: Interdisciplinary principles of automated visual evaluation in cervical screening.

Desai K, Befano B, Xue Z, Kelly H, Campos N, Egemen D Int J Cancer. 2021; 150(5):741-752.

PMID: 34800038 PMC: 8732320. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33879.


References
1.
Vaccarella S, Laversanne M, Ferlay J, Bray F . Cervical cancer in Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean and Asia: Regional inequalities and changing trends. Int J Cancer. 2017; 141(10):1997-2001. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30901. View

2.
Schiffman M, Kinney W, Cheung L, Gage J, Fetterman B, Poitras N . Relative Performance of HPV and Cytology Components of Cotesting in Cervical Screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017; 110(5):501-508. PMC: 6279277. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx225. View

3.
Huh W, Ault K, Chelmow D, Davey D, Goulart R, Garcia F . Use of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: interim clinical guidance. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 125(2):330-337. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000669. View

4.
Wentzensen N, Fetterman B, Castle P, Schiffman M, Wood S, Stiemerling E . p16/Ki-67 Dual Stain Cytology for Detection of Cervical Precancer in HPV-Positive Women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015; 107(12):djv257. PMC: 4675094. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv257. View

5.
Wentzensen N, Schiffman M, Palmer T, Arbyn M . Triage of HPV positive women in cervical cancer screening. J Clin Virol. 2015; 76 Suppl 1:S49-S55. PMC: 4789103. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.11.015. View