» Articles » PMID: 29654442

Understanding Social Anxiety Disorder in Adolescents and Improving Treatment Outcomes: Applying the Cognitive Model of Clark and Wells (1995)

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialties Pediatrics
Psychology
Date 2018 Apr 15
PMID 29654442
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Social anxiety disorder is a condition characterised by a marked and persistent fear of being humiliated or scrutinised by others. Age-of-onset data point to adolescence as a developmentally sensitive period for the emergence of the condition, at a time when the peer group becomes increasingly important. Social anxiety in adolescence is associated with considerable impairment that persists through to adulthood. There are clear potential benefits to delivering effective interventions during adolescence. However, there is limited evidence on the specific efficacy of available therapies. This is in contrast to adults, for whom we have interventions with very specific treatment effects. One such treatment is individual cognitive therapy. Cognitive therapy is based on the cognitive model of social anxiety proposed by Clark and Wells (in: Heimberg, Leibowitz, Hope, Scheiber (eds) Social phobia: diagnosis, assessment and treatment, The Guilford Press, New York, 1995). The present review examines the potential application of this adult cognitive model to the understanding of adolescent social anxiety and considers additional adolescent-specific factors that need to be accommodated. It is suggested that a developmentally sensitive adoption of the cognitive model of social anxiety disorder (Clark and Wells 1995) for adolescents may lead to better treatment outcomes.

Citing Articles

Worry and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescents with Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Stewart S, Houghton S, Glasgow K, Macqueen L Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 22(2).

PMID: 40003411 PMC: 11855072. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph22020185.


The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-based Interventions versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Social Anxiety of Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Dones 3rd V, Yamat K, Santos K, Concepcion A, Lacson M Acta Med Philipp. 2025; 59(2):15-24.

PMID: 39967702 PMC: 11831082. DOI: 10.47895/amp.vi0.8140.


Sleep-wake patterns of fencing athletes: a long-term wearable device study.

Dai J, Xu X, Chen G, Lv J, Xiao Y PeerJ. 2025; 13():e18812.

PMID: 39830957 PMC: 11740734. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18812.


Effectiveness cognitive emotion regulation strategies to reduce social anxiety and improve social self-efficacy.

Gazo A, Mahasneh A J Educ Health Promot. 2025; 13():450.

PMID: 39811834 PMC: 11731342. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_172_24.


Social anxiety in adolescence and the first timing of parental home leaving and living with a partner: a longitudinal population-based Young-HUNT3 study in Norway.

Halidu M, Moe C, Behboudi-Gandevani S, Haugan T Front Public Health. 2025; 12():1484501.

PMID: 39776489 PMC: 11703836. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1484501.


References
1.
Chorpita B, Tracey S, Brown T, Collica T, Barlow D . Assessment of worry in children and adolescents: an adaptation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behav Res Ther. 1997; 35(6):569-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7967(96)00116-7. View

2.
Hirsch C, Clark D, Mathews A, Williams R . Self-images play a causal role in social phobia. Behav Res Ther. 2003; 41(8):909-21. DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7967(02)00103-1. View

3.
McManus F, Sacadura C, Clark D . Why social anxiety persists: an experimental investigation of the role of safety behaviours as a maintaining factor. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2007; 39(2):147-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.12.002. View

4.
Miers A, Blote A, Westenberg P . Negative Social Cognitions in Socially Anxious Youth: Distorted Reality or a Kernel of Truth?. J Child Fam Stud. 2011; 20(2):214-223. PMC: 3048303. DOI: 10.1007/s10826-010-9423-2. View

5.
Loscalzo Y, Giannini M, Miers A . Social anxiety and interpretation bias: examining clinical and subclinical components in adolescents. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2020; 23(3):169-176. DOI: 10.1111/camh.12221. View