Land Use Intensity-Specific Global Characterization Factors to Assess Product Biodiversity Footprints
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The UNEP-SETAC life cycle initiative recently recommended use of the countryside species-area relationship (SAR) model to calculate the characterization factors (CFs; potential species loss per m) for projecting the biodiversity impact of land use associated with a products' life cycle. However, CFs based on this approach are to date available for only six broad land use types without differentiating between their management intensities and have large uncertainties that limit their practical applicability. Here we derive updated CFs for projecting potential species losses of five taxa resulting from five broad land use types (managed forests, plantations, pasture, cropland, urban) under three intensity levels (minimal, light, and intense use) in each of the 804 terrestrial ecoregions. We utilize recent global land use intensity maps and International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) habitat classification scheme to parametrize the SAR model. As a case study, we compare the biodiversity impacts of 1 m of wood produced under four different forest management regimes in India and demonstrate that the new land use intensity-specific CFs have smaller uncertainty intervals and are able to discern the impacts of intensively managed land uses from the low intensity regimes, which has not been possible through previous CFs.
Rabeschini G, Persson U, West C, Kastner T Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1799.
PMID: 39979300 PMC: 11842713. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57037-9.
Davin K, Koslowski M, Dorber M, Hertwich E J Ind Ecol. 2024; 28(6):1422-1434.
PMID: 39722868 PMC: 11667647. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13556.
Wang S, Pfister S Environ Sci Technol. 2024; 58(22):9601-9611.
PMID: 38761136 PMC: 11155242. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c07795.
Managing Forests for Biodiversity Conservation and Climate Change Mitigation.
Azuero-Pedraza C, Lauri P, Lessa Derci Augustynczik A, Thomas V Environ Sci Technol. 2024; 58(21):9175-9186.
PMID: 38743611 PMC: 11137864. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c07163.
Trade-offs in the externalities of pig production are not inevitable.
Bartlett H, Zanella M, Kaori B, Sabei L, Araujo M, de Paula T Nat Food. 2024; 5(4):312-322.
PMID: 38605128 PMC: 11045459. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-024-00921-2.