Evaluation of Six Sample Preparation Procedures for Qualitative and Quantitative Proteomics Analysis of Milk Fat Globule Membrane

Overview

Journal Electrophoresis

Specialty Chemistry

Date 2018 Apr 13

PMID 29644703

Citations 33

Authors

Yongxin Yang

Elizabeth Anderson

Sheng Zhang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Proteomic analysis of membrane proteins is challenged by the proteins solubility and detergent incompatibility with MS analysis. No single perfect protocol can be used to comprehensively characterize the proteome of membrane fraction. Here, we used cow milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) proteome analysis to assess six sample preparation procedures including one in-gel and five in-solution digestion approaches prior to LC-MS/MS analysis. The largest number of MFGM proteins were identified by suspension trapping (S-Trap) and filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) methods, followed by acetone precipitation without clean-up of tryptic peptides method. Protein identifications with highest average coverage was achieved by Chloroform/MeOH, in-gel and S-Trap methods. Most distinct proteins were identified by FASP method, followed by S-Trap. Analyses by Venn diagram, principal-component analysis, hierarchical clustering and the abundance ranking of quantitative proteins highlight differences in the MFGM fraction by the all sample preparation procedures. These results reveal the biased proteins/peptides loss occurred in each protocol. In this study, we found several novel proteins that were not observed previously by in-depth proteomics characterization of MFGM fraction in milk. Thus, a combination of multiple procedures with orthologous properties of sample preparation was demonstrated to improve the protein sequence coverage and expression level accuracy of membrane samples.

Citing Articles

Immortalized mammosphere-derived epithelial cells retain a bioactive secretome with antimicrobial, regenerative, and immunomodulatory properties.

Danev N, Poggi J, Dewever E, Bartlett A, Oliveira L, Huntimer L Stem Cell Res Ther. 2024; 15(1):429.

PMID: 39543714 PMC: 11566417. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-024-04019-1.

Chemoproteomic profiling of substrate specificity in gut microbiota-associated bile salt hydrolases.

Han L, Pendleton A, Singh A, Xu R, Scott S, Palma J Cell Chem Biol. 2024; 32(1):145-156.e9.

PMID: 38889717 PMC: 11632149. DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2024.05.009.

From bottom-up to cell surface proteomics: detergents or no detergents, that is the question.

Brough Z, Zhao Z, Duong van Hoa F Biochem Soc Trans. 2024; 52(3):1253-1263.

PMID: 38666604 PMC: 11346462. DOI: 10.1042/BST20231020.

Post-ischemic ubiquitination at the postsynaptic density reversibly influences the activity of ischemia-relevant kinases.

Dhawka L, Palfini V, Hambright E, Blanco I, Poon C, Kahl A Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):321.

PMID: 38480905 PMC: 10937959. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06009-8.

Complement system dysregulation in synovial fluid from patients with persistent inflammation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.

Keller L, Fortier L, Lattermann C, Hunt E, Zhang S, Fu Q J Cartil Jt Preserv. 2024; 3(4).

PMID: 38343688 PMC: 10853944. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjp.2023.100114.

References

Zhou J, Dann G, Shi T, Wang L, Gao X, Su D . Simple sodium dodecyl sulfate-assisted sample preparation method for LC-MS-based proteomics applications. Anal Chem. 2012; 84(6):2862-7. PMC: 3310275. DOI: 10.1021/ac203394r. View

Wisniewski J, Zougman A, Mann M . Combination of FASP and StageTip-based fractionation allows in-depth analysis of the hippocampal membrane proteome. J Proteome Res. 2009; 8(12):5674-8. DOI: 10.1021/pr900748n. View

Fong B, Norris C . Quantification of milk fat globule membrane proteins using selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. J Agric Food Chem. 2009; 57(14):6021-8. DOI: 10.1021/jf900511t. View

KYTE J, Doolittle R . A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol. 1982; 157(1):105-32. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0. View

Tacoma R, Fields J, Ebenstein D, Lam Y, Greenwood S . Characterization of the bovine milk proteome in early-lactation Holstein and Jersey breeds of dairy cows. J Proteomics. 2015; 130:200-10. PMC: 4859431. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.09.024. View

Reinhardt T, Lippolis J . Bovine milk fat globule membrane proteome. J Dairy Res. 2006; 73(4):406-16. DOI: 10.1017/S0022029906001889. View

Lu J, Argov-Argaman N, Anggrek J, Boeren S, van Hooijdonk T, Vervoort J . The protein and lipid composition of the membrane of milk fat globules depends on their size. J Dairy Sci. 2016; 99(6):4726-4738. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-10375. View

de Jong N, Visser S, Olieman C . Determination of milk proteins by capillary electrophoresis. J Chromatogr A. 1993; 652(1):207-13. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9673(93)80661-Q. View

Spertino S, Cipriani V, Angelis C, Giuffrida M, Marsano F, Cavaletto M . Proteome profile and biological activity of caprine, bovine and human milk fat globules. Mol Biosyst. 2011; 8(4):967-74. DOI: 10.1039/c2mb05400k. View

10.

Pasing Y, Colnoe S, Hansen T . Proteomics of hydrophobic samples: Fast, robust and low-cost workflows for clinical approaches. Proteomics. 2016; 17(6). DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201500462. View

11.

KROGH A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer E . Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001; 305(3):567-80. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315. View

12.

Arena S, Renzone G, Novi G, Scaloni A . Redox proteomics of fat globules unveils broad protein lactosylation and compositional changes in milk samples subjected to various technological procedures. J Proteomics. 2011; 74(11):2453-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.01.002. View

13.

Duester G . Families of retinoid dehydrogenases regulating vitamin A function: production of visual pigment and retinoic acid. Eur J Biochem. 2000; 267(14):4315-24. DOI: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01497.x. View

14.

Yang Y, Zheng N, Zhao X, Zhang Y, Han R, Ma L . Proteomic characterization and comparison of mammalian milk fat globule proteomes by iTRAQ analysis. J Proteomics. 2015; 116:34-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.12.017. View

15.

Pisanu S, Ghisaura S, Pagnozzi D, Biosa G, Tanca A, Roggio T . The sheep milk fat globule membrane proteome. J Proteomics. 2010; 74(3):350-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.11.011. View

16.

Wisniewski J, Zielinska D, Mann M . Comparison of ultrafiltration units for proteomic and N-glycoproteomic analysis by the filter-aided sample preparation method. Anal Biochem. 2010; 410(2):307-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.12.004. View

17.

Gallier S, Gragson D, Jimenez-Flores R, Everett D . Using confocal laser scanning microscopy to probe the milk fat globule membrane and associated proteins. J Agric Food Chem. 2010; 58(7):4250-7. PMC: 2853928. DOI: 10.1021/jf9032409. View

18.

Wessel D, Flugge U . A method for the quantitative recovery of protein in dilute solution in the presence of detergents and lipids. Anal Biochem. 1984; 138(1):141-3. DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(84)90782-6. View

19.

Bodnar J, Hajba L, Guttman A . A fully automated linear polyacrylamide coating and regeneration method for capillary electrophoresis of proteins. Electrophoresis. 2016; 37(23-24):3154-3159. DOI: 10.1002/elps.201600405. View

20.

Lipecka J, Chhuon C, Bourderioux M, Bessard M, van Endert P, Edelman A . Sensitivity of mass spectrometry analysis depends on the shape of the filtration unit used for filter aided sample preparation (FASP). Proteomics. 2016; 16(13):1852-7. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201600103. View