» Articles » PMID: 29643883

Comparison of Volume and Frequency Advancement Feeding Protocols in Very Low Birth Weight Neonates

Overview
Journal Pak J Med Sci
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2018 Apr 13
PMID 29643883
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine the outcomes in very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates receiving volume advancement versus frequency advancement feeding protocols.

Methods: This controlled clinical trial was conducted in Children Hospital Multan within duration of 6 months from February 2017 to August 2017. VLBW neonates having weight < 1500 g at the time of birth were included. The protocol for frequency advancement (FA) group was to give 1 ml/kg human or pre-formula milk after every 8 hours and in volume advancement (VA) group after every 3 hours initially. After three days, in FA group duration of feeds was decreased gradually from 8 to 2 hours and feed volume of 10 ml.kg.day until full-recommended dose of feeding i.e. 150 ml.kg.day reached. While in VA group, volume of 20 ml.kg.day was given until full-recommended dose of feeding reached. Days to achieve full feed, weight gain, and length of hospital stay were primary study outcomes.

Results: Baseline weight of neonates was 1148 (111) grams in VA 1179 (106) grams in FA groups (p-value 0.18). In VA group, full feed was achieved in 11.04 (2.38) days versus 15.76 (2.48) days in FA group (P-value <0.001). Duration of IV fluid therapy were 13.5 (8.4) days in FA group versus 9.4 (7.6) in VA group (p-value <0.001). Moreover weight gain at the end of feeding protocol was significantly higher in VA group 1440 (78) grams versus 1284 (99) grams in FA group (P-value <0.001). Necrotizing entero-colitis occurred in only one neonate that was belonging to volume advancement group.

Conclusion: Volume advancement (VA) feeding is better as compared to frequency advancement (FA) feeding in very low birth weight neonates.

Citing Articles

Short versus long feeding interval for bolus feedings in very preterm infants.

Ibrahim N, Rostenberghe H, Ho J, Nasir A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 8:CD012322.

PMID: 34415568 PMC: 8407504. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012322.pub2.

References
1.
Caple J, Armentrout D, Huseby V, Halbardier B, Garcia J, Sparks J . Randomized, controlled trial of slow versus rapid feeding volume advancement in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2004; 114(6):1597-600. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-1232. View

2.
Embleton N . Optimal protein and energy intakes in preterm infants. Early Hum Dev. 2007; 83(12):831-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.10.001. View

3.
. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2012; 129(3):e827-41. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2011-3552. View

4.
Franz A, Pohlandt F, Bode H, Mihatsch W, Sander S, Kron M . Intrauterine, early neonatal, and postdischarge growth and neurodevelopmental outcome at 5.4 years in extremely preterm infants after intensive neonatal nutritional support. Pediatrics. 2009; 123(1):e101-9. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008-1352. View

5.
Lima P, de Carvalho M, Carioca da Costa A, Lopes Moreira M . Variables associated with extra uterine growth restriction in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2013; 90(1):22-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2013.05.007. View