Factors Influencing Right Hemisphere Engagement During Metaphor Comprehension

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2018 Apr 13

PMID 29643825

Citations 12

Authors

Michele T Diaz

Anna Eppes

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Although the left hemisphere is critical for language, clinical, behavioral, and neuroimaging research suggest that the right hemisphere also contributes to language comprehension. In particular, research has suggested that figurative language may be one type of language that preferentially engages right hemisphere regions. However, there is disagreement about whether these regions within the right hemisphere are sensitive to figurative language or to other factors that co-vary with figurativeness. In this article, we will review the neuroimaging literature on figurative language processing, focusing on metaphors, within the context of several theoretical perspectives that have been proposed about hemispheric function in language. Then we will examine three factors that may influence right hemisphere engagement: novelty, task difficulty, and context. We propose that factors that increase integration demands drive right hemisphere involvement in language processing, and that such recruitment is not limited to figurative language.

Citing Articles

Naturalistic reading of multi-page texts elicits spatially extended modulation of oscillatory activity in the right hemisphere.

Makela S, Kujala J, Ojala P, Hyona J, Salmelin R Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30800.

PMID: 39730469 PMC: 11680895. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81098-3.

Mapping sentence comprehension and syntactic complexity: evidence from 131 stroke survivors.

Biondo N, Ivanova M, Pracar A, Baldo J, Dronkers N Brain Commun. 2024; 6(6):fcae379.

PMID: 39554380 PMC: 11565230. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae379.

Pre-Stimulus Activity of Left and Right TPJ in Linguistic Predictive Processing: A MEG Study.

Lago S, Zago S, Bambini V, Arcara G Brain Sci. 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 39452027 PMC: 11505736. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14101014.

Neural Coupling between Interhemispheric and Frontoparietal Functional Connectivity during Semantic Processing.

Soshi T Brain Sci. 2023; 13(11).

PMID: 38002560 PMC: 10670303. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13111601.

Neural underpinnings of processing combinatorial unstated meaning and the influence of individual cognitive style.

Lai Y, Sakai H, Makuuchi M Cereb Cortex. 2023; 33(18):10013-10027.

PMID: 37557907 PMC: 10502793. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhad261.

References

Forgacs B, Lukacs A, Pleh C . Lateralized processing of novel metaphors: disentangling figurativeness and novelty. Neuropsychologia. 2014; 56:101-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.01.003. View

Thibodeau P, Boroditsky L . Metaphors we think with: the role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS One. 2011; 6(2):e16782. PMC: 3044156. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016782. View

Brownell H, Simpson T, Bihrle A, Potter H, Gardner H . Appreciation of metaphoric alternative word meanings by left and right brain-damaged patients. Neuropsychologia. 1990; 28(4):375-83. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(90)90063-t. View

Beeman M, Friedman R, Grafman J, Perez E, Diamond S, Lindsay M . Summation priming and coarse semantic coding in the right hemisphere. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013; 6(1):26-45. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1994.6.1.26. View

Davis A, WADA J . Speech dominance and handedness in the normal human. Brain Lang. 1978; 5(1):42-55. DOI: 10.1016/0093-934x(78)90006-8. View

McIntyre M, Pritchard 3rd P, Lombroso C . Left and right temporal lobe epileptics: a controlled investigation of some psychological differences. Epilepsia. 1976; 17(4):377-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1976.tb04449.x. View

Ahrens K, Liu H, Lee C, Gong S, Fang S, Hsu Y . Functional MRI of conventional and anomalous metaphors in Mandarin Chinese. Brain Lang. 2005; 100(2):163-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.10.004. View

Bottini G, Corcoran R, Sterzi R, Paulesu E, Schenone P, Scarpa P . The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language. A positron emission tomography activation study. Brain. 1994; 117 ( Pt 6):1241-53. DOI: 10.1093/brain/117.6.1241. View

Chen E, Widick P, Chatterjee A . Functional-anatomical organization of predicate metaphor processing. Brain Lang. 2008; 107(3):194-202. PMC: 2638768. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.06.007. View

10.

Stringaris A, Medford N, Giora R, Giampietro V, Brammer M, David A . How metaphors influence semantic relatedness judgments: the role of the right frontal cortex. Neuroimage. 2006; 33(2):784-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.057. View

11.

Schwanenflugel P, Akin C, Luh W . Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words. Mem Cognit. 1992; 20(1):96-104. DOI: 10.3758/bf03208259. View

12.

Faust M, Kravetz S, Babkoff H . Hemisphericity and top-down processing of language. Brain Lang. 1993; 44(1):1-18. DOI: 10.1006/brln.1993.1001. View

13.

Federmeier K, Kutas M . Picture the difference: electrophysiological investigations of picture processing in the two cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychologia. 2002; 40(7):730-47. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00193-2. View

14.

Federmeier K, McLennan D, De Ochoa E, Kutas M . The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: an ERP study. Psychophysiology. 2002; 39(2):133-46. DOI: 10.1017/S0048577202001373. View

15.

Gagnon L, Goulet P, Giroux F, Joanette Y . Processing of metaphoric and non-metaphoric alternative meanings of words after right- and left-hemispheric lesion. Brain Lang. 2003; 87(2):217-26. DOI: 10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00057-9. View

16.

Federmeier K, Kutas M . Right words and left words: electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1999; 8(3):373-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(99)00036-1. View

17.

Mashal N, Faust M, Hendler T, Jung-Beeman M . An fMRI study of processing novel metaphoric sentences. Laterality. 2008; 14(1):30-54. DOI: 10.1080/13576500802049433. View

18.

Lee S, Dapretto M . Metaphorical vs. literal word meanings: fMRI evidence against a selective role of the right hemisphere. Neuroimage. 2005; 29(2):536-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.003. View

19.

Blasko D, Connine C . Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993; 19(2):295-308. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.2.295. View

20.

Faust M, Babkoff H, Kravetz S . Linguistic processes in the two cerebral hemispheres: implications for modularity vs interactionism. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1995; 17(2):171-92. DOI: 10.1080/01688639508405117. View