Article: Pilot Study of an Open-source Image Analysis Software for Automated Screening of Conventional Cervical Smears

Introduction: The Pap stained cervical smear is a screening tool for cervical cancer. Commercial systems are used for automated screening of liquid based cervical smears. However, there is no image analysis software used for conventional cervical smears. The aim of this study was to develop and test the diagnostic accuracy of a software for analysis of conventional smears.

Materials And Methods: The software was developed using Python programming language and open source libraries. It was standardized with images from Bethesda Interobserver Reproducibility Project. One hundred and thirty images from smears which were reported Negative for Intraepithelial Lesion or Malignancy (NILM), and 45 images where some abnormality has been reported, were collected from the archives of the hospital. The software was then tested on the images.

Results: The software was able to segregate images based on overall nuclear: cytoplasmic ratio, coefficient of variation (CV) in nuclear size, nuclear membrane irregularity, and clustering. 68.88% of abnormal images were flagged by the software, as well as 19.23% of NILM images. The major difficulties faced were segmentation of overlapping cell clusters and separation of neutrophils.

Conclusion: The software shows potential as a screening tool for conventional cervical smears; however, further refinement in technique is required.

Citing Articles

Performance characteristics of an artificial intelligence based on convolutional neural network for screening conventional Papanicolaou-stained cervical smears.

Sanyal P, Ganguli P, Barui S Med J Armed Forces India. 2020; 76(4):418-424.

PMID: 33162650 PMC: 7606095. DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2019.08.001.

An evaluation of the construction of the device along with the software for digital archiving, sending the data, and supporting the diagnosis of cervical cancer.

Lasyk L, Barbasz J, Zuk P, Prusaczyk A, Wlodarczyk T, Prokurat E Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2019; 23(3):174-177.

PMID: 31798334 PMC: 6883966. DOI: 10.5114/wo.2019.85617.

References

1.

Mariarputham E, Stephen A . Nominated texture based cervical cancer classification. Comput Math Methods Med. 2015; 2015:586928. PMC: 4310228. DOI: 10.1155/2015/586928. View

2.

Dey P, Banerjee N, Kaur R . Digital image classification with the help of artificial neural network by simple histogram. J Cytol. 2016; 33(2):63-5. PMC: 4881406. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9371.182515. View

3.

Nayar R, Solomon D . Second edition of 'The Bethesda System for reporting cervical cytology' - atlas, website, and Bethesda interobserver reproducibility project. Cytojournal. 2004; 1(1):4. PMC: 526759. DOI: 10.1186/1742-6413-1-4. View

4.

Bora K, Chowdhury M, Mahanta L, Kundu M, Das A . Automated classification of Pap smear images to detect cervical dysplasia. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016; 138:31-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.10.001. View

5.

Birdsong G . Automated screening of cervical cytology specimens. Hum Pathol. 1996; 27(5):468-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0046-8177(96)90090-8. View

6.

Zhang L, Kong H, Chin C, Liu S, Fan X, Wang T . Automation-assisted cervical cancer screening in manual liquid-based cytology with hematoxylin and eosin staining. Cytometry A. 2013; 85(3):214-30. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.22407. View

7.

Yang-Mao S, Chan Y, Chu Y . Edge enhancement nucleus and cytoplast contour detector of cervical smear images. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2008; 38(2):353-66. DOI: 10.1109/TSMCB.2007.912940. View

8.

Bergmeir C, Garcia Silvente M, Manuel Benitez J . Segmentation of cervical cell nuclei in high-resolution microscopic images: A new algorithm and a web-based software framework. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2012; 107(3):497-512. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.09.017. View

9.

Saieg M, Motta T, Fodra M, Scapulatempo C, Longatto-Filho A, Stiepcich M . Automated screening of conventional gynecological cytology smears: feasible and reliable. Acta Cytol. 2014; 58(4):378-82. DOI: 10.1159/000365944. View

10.

Wilbur D, Bonfiglio T, Rutkowski M, Atkison K, Richart R, Lee J . Sensitivity of the AutoPap 300 QC System for cervical cytologic abnormalities. Biopsy data confirmation. Acta Cytol. 1996; 40(1):127-32. DOI: 10.1159/000333593. View

11.

Wilbur D, Prey M, Miller W, Pawlick G, Colgan T . The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice. Acta Cytol. 1998; 42(1):214-20. DOI: 10.1159/000331549. View