» Articles » PMID: 29643623

Effect of Dexmedetomidine Infusion on Hemodynamic Responses in Microsurgery of Larynx

Overview
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2018 Apr 13
PMID 29643623
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Microlaryngeal surgery is a frequently performed ear, nose, and throat procedure used to diagnose and treat laryngeal disorders. Suspension laryngoscopy causes prolonged stimulation of the deep pressure receptors of the larynx leading to adverse circulatory responses and consequently cardiac complications. In this study, dexmedetomidine infusion was used to assess its effectiveness for attenuation of this hemodynamic stress response.

Material And Methods: Sixty patients undergoing elective microlaryngeal surgery randomly received either dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg over 10 min followed by continuous infusion of 0.5 μg/kg (Group D) or normal saline infusion at the same rate (Group P) till the end of surgery. Anesthesia in all patients was induced with propofol, succinylcholine to facilitate endotracheal intubation after premedication with fentanyl 2 μg/kg and glycopyrrolate. Intraoperative, vital parameters were maintained within 20% of baseline with rescue analgesic fentanyl 1 μg/kg and subsequently with propofol boluses up to 1 mg/kg. The percentage of patients and the total amount of intraoperative fentanyl and propofol required in each group were recorded. Sedation score at 10 minutes postextubation was assessed by Ramsay sedation score.

Results: Intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial pressure in Group D were lower than the baseline values and the corresponding values in Group P ( > 0.05). The percentage of patients requiring rescue fentanyl and propofol was higher in Group P than Group D (36.6% and 30% vs. 6.6% and 3.3% = 0.01). Recovery scores were better in dexmedetomidine group.

Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine infusion attenuates the hemodynamic stress response during laryngoscopy, intubation, and microlaryngeal surgery and is associated better recovery profile.

Citing Articles

Dexmedetomidine vs. Fentanyl-Midazolam Combination to Mitigate the Stress Response in Microlaryngoscopy: A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial.

Oriby M, Elrashidy A, Khafagy A, Philip Rezkalla P Anesth Pain Med. 2023; 13(3):e135276.

PMID: 38021325 PMC: 10664168. DOI: 10.5812/aapm-135276.


A comparative study of clinical effects and recovery characteristics of intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion with ketamine versus fentanyl as adjuvants in general anaesthesia.

Lodhi M, Sulakshana S, Singh A, Gupta B Indian J Anaesth. 2023; 67(Suppl 2):S126-S132.

PMID: 37122940 PMC: 10132681. DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_294_22.

References
1.
Kang W, Kim S, Son J, Kim J, Muhammad H, Kim S . The effect of dexmedetomidine on the adjuvant propofol requirement and intraoperative hemodynamics during remifentanil-based anesthesia. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012; 62(2):113-8. PMC: 3284731. DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2012.62.2.113. View

2.
Gurbet A, Basagan-Mogol E, Turker G, Ugun F, Kaya F, Ozcan B . Intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine reduces perioperative analgesic requirements. Can J Anaesth. 2006; 53(7):646-52. DOI: 10.1007/BF03021622. View

3.
Matot I, Sichel J, Yofe V, Gozal Y . The effect of clonidine premedication on hemodynamic responses to microlaryngoscopy and rigid bronchoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2000; 91(4):828-33. DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200010000-00011. View

4.
Keniya V, Ladi S, Naphade R . Dexmedetomidine attenuates sympathoadrenal response to tracheal intubation and reduces perioperative anaesthetic requirement. Indian J Anaesth. 2011; 55(4):352-7. PMC: 3190508. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.84846. View

5.
Dehkordi M, Razavi S, Momenzadeh S . A Comparison between Sedative Effect of Propofol-Fentanyl and Propofol-Midazolam Combinations in Microlaryngeal Surgeries. Iran J Pharm Res. 2013; 11(1):287-94. PMC: 3813093. View