» Articles » PMID: 29635277

Impact of Public Health Responses During a Measles Outbreak in an Amish Community in Ohio: Modeling the Dynamics of Transmission

Overview
Journal Am J Epidemiol
Specialty Public Health
Date 2018 Apr 11
PMID 29635277
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We quantified measles transmissibility during a measles outbreak in Ohio in 2014 to evaluate the impact of public health responses. Case incidence and the serial interval (time between symptom onset in primary cases and secondary cases) were used to assess trends in the effective reproduction number R (the average number of secondary cases generated per case). A mathematical model was parameterized using early R values to determine the size and duration of the outbreak that would have occurred if containment measures had not been initiated, as well as the impact of vaccination. As containment started, we found a 4-fold decline in R (from approximately 4 to 1) over the course of 2 weeks and maintenance of R < 1 as control measures continued. Under a conservative scenario, the model estimated 8,472 cases (90% confidence interval (CI): 8,447, 8,489) over 195 days (90% CI: 179, 223) without control efforts and 715 cases (90% CI: 103, 1,338) over 128 days (90% CI: 117, 139) when vaccination was included; 7,757 fewer cases (90% CI: 7,130, 8,365) and 67 fewer outbreak days (90% CI: 48, 98) were attributed to vaccination. Vaccination may not account entirely for transmission reductions, suggesting that changes in community behavior (social distancing) and other control efforts (isolation, quarantining) are important. Our findings highlight the benefits of measles outbreak response and of understanding behavior change dynamics.

Citing Articles

Why Turkish Parents Refuse Childhood Vaccination? A Qualitative Study.

Aslan S, Ozkara A, Kasim I, Aksoy H Arch Iran Med. 2024; 26(5):267-274.

PMID: 38301090 PMC: 10685866. DOI: 10.34172/aim.2023.41.


[Maintaining measles elimination status in Colombia during outbreak control, 2019Manutenção do status de eliminação do sarampo na Colômbia durante o controle de surtos, 2019].

Prieto Alvarado F, Salas Suspes H, Cortes Molano N, Tavera P Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2023; 47:e165.

PMID: 38089106 PMC: 10712572. DOI: 10.26633/RPSP.2023.165.


Spatial Clustering of Vaccine Exemptions on the Risk of a Measles Outbreak.

Gromis A, Liu K Pediatrics. 2021; 149(1).

PMID: 34866158 PMC: 9037455. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-050971.


Maintenance of Measles Elimination Status in the United States for 20 Years Despite Increasing Challenges.

Mathis A, Clemmons N, Redd S, Pham H, Leung J, Wharton A Clin Infect Dis. 2021; 75(3):416-424.

PMID: 34849648 PMC: 11288340. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab979.


What Happened Pre- and during COVID-19 in South Korea? Comparing Physical Activity, Sleep Time, and Body Weight Status.

Park J, Yoo E, Kim Y, Lee J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(11).

PMID: 34072563 PMC: 8199264. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18115863.


References
1.
Thompson K, Kisjes K . Modeling Measles Transmission in the North American Amish and Options for Outbreak Response. Risk Anal. 2015; 36(7):1404-17. DOI: 10.1111/risa.12440. View

2.
Ortega-Sanchez I, Vijayaraghavan M, Barskey A, Wallace G . The economic burden of sixteen measles outbreaks on United States public health departments in 2011. Vaccine. 2013; 32(11):1311-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.10.012. View

3.
Wallinga J, Teunis P . Different epidemic curves for severe acute respiratory syndrome reveal similar impacts of control measures. Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 160(6):509-16. PMC: 7110200. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwh255. View

4.
Chatterji M, Baldwin A, Prakash R, Vlack S, Lambert S . Public health response to a measles outbreak in a large correctional facility, Queensland, 2013. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2015; 38(4):E294-7. View

5.
De Serres G, Markowski F, Toth E, Landry M, Auger D, Mercier M . Largest measles epidemic in North America in a decade--Quebec, Canada, 2011: contribution of susceptibility, serendipity, and superspreading events. J Infect Dis. 2012; 207(6):990-8. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jis923. View